Marvin said:You don't know what's going on with Terry or Toure. None of us do. You're making some pretty strong claims and allegations over matters you know little about.alera said:Love them all at city if it means the likes of Ben Haim going but not at the expense of home grown players like Nedum. Have to draw the line somewhere.
Terry is a mercenary fucker its clear. £35 million + £250k a week hes 29 fucked back pissing everyone around including the club he is meant to love. Hes had plenty of chance to sort this out pissing everyone around couldnt care less if he comes or not TBH.
I would love Lescott but not at the expense of Nedum and not for £30 million.
As for Toure according to his brother he would never take such a big step down to city ? Yea I would love to have him at city. Huntellar is hated for saying the same whats the difference Toure saying it via proxy ?
fulhamroad22 said:lc-mcfc said:One question fulhamroad22...
Do you now consider John Terry as ''Mr Chelsea'' or ''Mr Money''?
Mr Money. So long he holds Chelsea hostage to get more money. If he stays or if he goes he has proved he is not loyal, he is two faced and has his head turned by money. When we were the richest club he was happy to stay, now City are the richest club he is happy to go. I don't believe he is driven by ambition as I reckon there is just as much ambition at Chelsea as there is at City- so is it worth going back on every statement you made to go? If he went it'd be for nothing but the money and maybe a slight aspect of wanting to try something new- something he should man up to and do if he wants to go.
Same can be said if he is using these threats to get more money out of Chelsea.
It's getting to the point where I don't want him to be captain of the team if he is so driven by his wallet.
I can totally understand why he'd want to chase a bit more money, but I think he should grow a pair of balls and tell the people that have made him who he is, his intentions. There is clearly a lot more to it than stagnance.
If he wants to continue on his current contract, he'll be well respected still. But if he is holding out for more at either City or Chelsea he will lose a lot of respect.
alera said:All I will say to people is saying you are happy for home grown players that have been with us for years and can peform at the highest level can be fucked off no problem for players in their late 20s comming for the money be careful what you wish for.
I am assuming its fine for Ireland to be fucked off as well then where are we going to draw the line ?
Happy for all three of them to come if the deals are right AND THEY WANT TO COME.
But not at the expense of core english home grown players like nedum. You can put me on a wall and shoot me in the head before I will agree to that.
We will lose where we are comming from very quickly if the majority start thinking this is acceptable IMO.
lc-mcfc said:fulhamroad22 said:Mr Money. So long he holds Chelsea hostage to get more money. If he stays or if he goes he has proved he is not loyal, he is two faced and has his head turned by money. When we were the richest club he was happy to stay, now City are the richest club he is happy to go. I don't believe he is driven by ambition as I reckon there is just as much ambition at Chelsea as there is at City- so is it worth going back on every statement you made to go? If he went it'd be for nothing but the money and maybe a slight aspect of wanting to try something new- something he should man up to and do if he wants to go.
Same can be said if he is using these threats to get more money out of Chelsea.
It's getting to the point where I don't want him to be captain of the team if he is so driven by his wallet.
I can totally understand why he'd want to chase a bit more money, but I think he should grow a pair of balls and tell the people that have made him who he is, his intentions. There is clearly a lot more to it than stagnance.
If he wants to continue on his current contract, he'll be well respected still. But if he is holding out for more at either City or Chelsea he will lose a lot of respect.
Honest answer mate.
If he stays, do you think the Chelsea fans will boo him at games?
S.E.H said:moomba said:Hope the article is bullshit. Rather have none of them than spend £100m plus Onuoha for the three.
In fact if any of the deals include Onuoha Fi'd look elsewhere.
Give it a fuckin rest, id have any of them in place of Onuoha. I dont get it, up until February, Onuoha's City career had been poor, in CB and RB positions. You would watch him in games and see his potential with his pace etc but he was crap. Yes, 2nd half of last season he played well but does this all of a sudden make him our star player? I dont think so, and if sacrificing him means bringing any of JT, JL or Kolo to the club, then so be it.
fulhamroad22 said:lc-mcfc said:Honest answer mate.
If he stays, do you think the Chelsea fans will boo him at games?
Not if he stays. They will if he goes. I think football fans are fickle in that way. As long as he is in a dark blue shirt no one will complain even if he is a money grabbing two-faced fucker but if he is in a sky blue shirt in the same situation the fans will tear him to pieces.
Shame really, I mean he's done a lot of work for us, the only issue I have is he makes out he is a one club player that isn't driven by money. According to the speculation, though, that isn't the case.
At this point in time Frank Lampard has the best attitude in the team (despite the situation last summer). I'd like to see him as captain to be honest if all this speculation is true.
The Fixer said:If JT keeps the silence how likely is RA going to feel undermined? would he get to a point where he thinks fcuk you terry?