John Terry [Merged]

Status
Not open for further replies.
alera said:
Give it a fuckin rest, id have any of them in place of Onuoha. I dont get it, up until February, Onuoha's City career had been poor, in CB and RB positions. You would watch him in games and see his potential with his pace etc but he was crap. Yes, 2nd half of last season he played well but does this all of a sudden make him our star player? I dont think so, and if sacrificing him means bringing any of JT, JL or Kolo to the club, then so be it.

FUCK THAT

Terry - 29 fucked back and mercenary mother fucker.

Lescott - Fucked Knees - £20 + million + Nedum + Jo on loan and cheap I would rather have nedum

Toure - Shit since he got Malaria

I would rather keep a home grown player that has the potential to be a great and in his early 20s.

You can go fuck yourself !
If I hadn't seen your previous posts I'd assume you were being ironic.
 
Love them all at city if it means the likes of Ben Haim going but not at the expense of home grown players like Nedum. Have to draw the line somewhere.

Terry is a mercenary fucker its clear. £35 million + £250k a week hes 29 fucked back pissing everyone around including the club he is meant to love. Hes had plenty of chance to sort this out pissing everyone around couldnt care less if he comes or not TBH.

I would love Lescott but not at the expense of Nedum and not for £30 million.

As for Toure according to his brother he would never take such a big step down to city ? Yea I would love to have him at city. Huntellar is hated for saying the same whats the difference Toure saying it via proxy ?
 
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mcfc.co.uk/News/Team-news/2009/July/Tevez-trains-for-first-time" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mcfc.co.uk/News/Team-news/20 ... first-time</a>

Mon 20 Jul 2009, 6:20PM
Posted by Tim Oscroft

The Manager also refuted suggestions made in a newspaper story this morning that Nedum Onuoha would be sold as a makeweight in a deal to bring another defender to the Club.

"I am aware of that story," he added, "and I can say categorically that there is not truth in it whatsoever. Nedum is one of our finest young players, he was outstanding for us last season, and I am not looking to move one of our prize assets away from Manchester City."

it's less than categoric, but it makes it's point pretty clearly nonetheless. moving nedum on would be unpopular. a loan would be acceptable to most. What would people's reaction be if Nedum said he wanted to leave to play regularly? Don't sign Terry/Lescott?
 
What I don't understand is, a few days ago the Times claimed that JT was definitely staying. Now City are closing in on the transfer. What?

They really don't have a clue what's going on, do they?
 
I think the media are just coming to the same conclusion that we are about Terry, i.e if he was going to commit to Chelsea he would have cleared it all up by now. There's nothing substantive in those newspaper articles. It's just speculation, and opinion.
 
fulhamroad22 said:
What I don't understand is, a few days ago the Times claimed that JT was definitely staying. Now City are closing in on the transfer. What?

They really don't have a clue what's going on, do they?

Obviously they bought the line Chelsea fed to them in the States.

Seems the reality is somewhat different :-)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.