elanos thumb
Well-Known Member
Fuck me, is it that many areas? But the are borded. I dont know the
directions, it is at the same side as a little stream i think
directions, it is at the same side as a little stream i think
wrongun73 said:what dou you mean by closed, boarded up?elanos tumb said:This is off topic, but what is the area with the closed houses close to COMS?
could be beswick, ancoats, miles platting, pretty much anywhere
who??Pam said:John Terry.
fulhamroad22 said:I feel the most important development in this situation is the suggestion by Peter Kenyon that JT wants a new contract and Chelsea will be happy to do that. The fact we were offering Lampard a contract last season wasn't shouted from the rooftops until it was signed and I think it is a similar situation here. It appears that JT is using City's interest to influence negotiations and he is not making any statements to save his reputation. He can't say he is staying with Chelsea no matter what as it would reduce his contract, he can't say he will only stay if he gets an improved contract and he certainly can't say he wants to leave for City if he only wanted an improved Chelsea contract. The latter two options would destroy his reputation at Chelsea.
I feel we won't hear anything from JT until the contract is signed.
Â
fulhamroad22 said:I feel the most important development in this situation is the suggestion by Peter Kenyon that JT wants a new contract and Chelsea will be happy to do that. The fact we were offering Lampard a contract last season wasn't shouted from the rooftops until it was signed and I think it is a similar situation here. It appears that JT is using City's interest to influence negotiations and he is not making any statements to save his reputation. He can't say he is staying with Chelsea no matter what as it would reduce his contract, he can't say he will only stay if he gets an improved contract and he certainly can't say he wants to leave for City if he only wanted an improved Chelsea contract. The latter two options would destroy his reputation at Chelsea.
I feel we won't hear anything from JT until the contract is signed.
Â
he's fucking wank mate, we never wanted him in the first place, just wanted to see what you'd say.. etc etcfulhamroad22 said:I feel the most important development in this situation is the suggestion by Peter Kenyon that JT wants a new contract and Chelsea will be happy to do that. The fact we were offering Lampard a contract last season wasn't shouted from the rooftops until it was signed and I think it is a similar situation here. It appears that JT is using City's interest to influence negotiations and he is not making any statements to save his reputation. He can't say he is staying with Chelsea no matter what as it would reduce his contract, he can't say he will only stay if he gets an improved contract and he certainly can't say he wants to leave for City if he only wanted an improved Chelsea contract. The latter two options would destroy his reputation at Chelsea.
I feel we won't hear anything from JT until the contract is signed.
Â
bluemooner_mcfc said:fulhamroad22 said:I feel the most important development in this situation is the suggestion by Peter Kenyon that JT wants a new contract and Chelsea will be happy to do that. The fact we were offering Lampard a contract last season wasn't shouted from the rooftops until it was signed and I think it is a similar situation here. It appears that JT is using City's interest to influence negotiations and he is not making any statements to save his reputation. He can't say he is staying with Chelsea no matter what as it would reduce his contract, he can't say he will only stay if he gets an improved contract and he certainly can't say he wants to leave for City if he only wanted an improved Chelsea contract. The latter two options would destroy his reputation at Chelsea.
I feel we won't hear anything from JT until the contract is signed.
Â
i think your spot on.