M
M
Johnson was as committed to Northern Powerhouse Rail as he had been to Crossrail
- Thread starter Vic
- Start date
Seems like Manchester hasn't done too badly out of this (IF the stations at the airport and Piccadilly/HS2 does get built). Quite a bit of detail to go through but I supsect it could've gone far worse...but we'll see.
New line from Warrington to lil ol Marsden too.
New line from Warrington to lil ol Marsden too.
bobbyowenquiff
Well-Known Member
It is embarrassing to see how far we have fallen behind as a country, This has been happening for decades. It is only partially about party politics. What it shows is structural failure in our political system. Everyone is upset about corruption but that's just a distraction (there will always be corruption). The main problem is total incompetence. We have a political system that is hundreds of years old and not fit for purpose. Unfortunately the country seems fixated on the past and unwilling to modernise.
remember arthur mann
Well-Known Member
Lies on the Line.
Len Rum
Well-Known Member
Look at the title of the thread mate and then remember BloJo's pledge to fund the Manchester Leeds route made back in 2019 just like wot he did in London with Crosrail.
Liverpool-Manchester-Leeds not having a high speed connection to make it easy to commute across these three cities is criminal. The economic upturn from allowing this, by gaining investment as the pool of workers able to join businesses would be great. Every business I’ve ever worked for that had a HQ in London, rarely gave a toss about anything that happened up north. It appears consecutive governments have felt the same.
BobKowalski
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 May 2007
- Messages
- 21,511
Anna Soubry enjoying herself today
‘A #Conservative MP has just told #politicslive “yes the Prime Minister has broken his promise” on #HS2 East & N Powerhouse new lines and rail improvements #LiesOnTheLine’
‘A #Conservative MP has just told #politicslive “yes the Prime Minister has broken his promise” on #HS2 East & N Powerhouse new lines and rail improvements #LiesOnTheLine’
bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
The idea that you can catch one in Iraq and Morocco is shameful
bobbyowenquiff
Well-Known Member
The Chinese have built 23,500 miles of High Speed train lines in the last 13 years. Most of the country is covered on a grid system. The trains have a top speed of 268mph and they are planning to launch a new faster train in 2025 which has a top speed of a staggering 372mph (600km per hour). We are literally decades behind other nations including African countries, Turkey, Russia, let alone Europe etc etc. We will not be able to compete economically with these countries. We are a transport basket case and this disaster has been a long time in the making.
Why not invest in making it easier for people to commute into cities from the outskirts rather than getting from one to the other. That is more important.
thousands commute into Manchester, Leeds etc from the outskirts with crap services available every day. The number travelling between Manchester and Leeds and elsewhere is a small fraction of that.
thousands commute into Manchester, Leeds etc from the outskirts with crap services available every day. The number travelling between Manchester and Leeds and elsewhere is a small fraction of that.
metalblue
Well-Known Member
Pointless comparisons. China doesn’t give a fuck about building train lines through entire communities or irreversibly damaging areas of environmental importance. Nor does Russia - and nor does Turkey albeit to a slightly lesser extent.
The government will get dragged over the coals but - putting the politics aside for a moment - let’s not ignore that it’s still a huge investment we are putting into upgrading the infrastructure and Manchester has done well out of it. Significantly improving journey times for the majority rather than making it quicker to travel between 2 cities on the eastern side is, I think, a better result in the first instance. Like always some win some lose, but hopefully the majority wins.
There is the other new reality in all of this as well. Post COVID we won’t commute for work like we did before (commuter numbers are estimated to be ~30% lower than pre-COVID). Remote working will be the norm for many - you don’t need fast trains when you don’t leave your house. COVID may end up giving us “levelling up” (although of course Boris will try and take the credit for it).
bobbyowenquiff
Well-Known Member
It is not just China though. High speed integrated transport is extensive across Europe. We need integrated transport systems to get people out of their cars and this won't happen till they have a genuine alternative. People living in London do not understand what it is like in the rest of the UK. It is not just about commuting. Today's investment is welcome but it is just scratching the surface. Britain remains a totally centralised country and that is just not sustainable. We have failed to properly upgrade transport systems for 50 years. We don't even have a fully electrified network. It is a national disgrace.
BobKowalski
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 May 2007
- Messages
- 21,511
France has had high speed rail connections for nigh on 40 years. Germany the last 30 years. Spain has 3,000 km of high speed track. The fastest track in Italy connects all the major cities.
We have one track. One bloody high speed track and that’s the Eurostar link. And we peasants should be grateful for a few upgrades?
Why we continually accept second best and pay through the nose for it is bizarre, in fact we pretend it’s really not that bad. Partisan politics clouding rational thought and blinding us to reality. We pretend trade gravity doesn’t exist. We pretend distance is not a factor in trade. Now we are pretending we don’t need fast trains - and it’s about capacity as well as speed. This desire to handicap ourselves at every turn and insist the opposite is remarkable and somewhat creepy.
Mr Kobayashi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2020
- Messages
- 17,873
Why do we want high-speed rail...
How are we supposed to build classrooms of the future with expensive purpose built high speed rolling stock?
metalblue
Well-Known Member
I don’t disagree with anything you have written.
I’d probably say commuting is the key drivers for improving our rails, economically no one really gives a shit about folk wanting to go to MeadowHell from Bradford an hour quicker. A quite frankly if it takes Mrs MB longer to get there I’m happier!! Infrastructure projects are generally considered to always give 100% return on investment but that is measured as efficiency for business (getting to meetings/work) rather than footfall in a shopping mall.
metalblue
Well-Known Member
Much of that is reasonable, capacity (and what to do when a train breaks down and blocks the line) are hugely important. Cost is another good point. I don’t think it’ll be a “few upgrades” though. It’s serious money they are throwing at it.
MillionMilesAway
Well-Known Member
I think there is some (deliberate in some cases, such as politicians) confused use of highspeed.
Bullet train type speed - the UK has very little use for this. The east coast, some of the west coast and maybe some of the GWR have stretched that it could be used, but the UK is small with towns close to each other, and has hills in awkward places for this level. The Eurostar only uses its speed really on the continent.
InterCity speed - something closer to this is probably what's of interest in most places. It will speed up journeys quite enough. To do so will require a lot of digging, but I assume the main issue is that lots of signalling would need ripping out and rebuilding. I guess they can ask Dido to deal with it.
The claim from Johnson this morning that the journey time from Birmingham to Nottingham would be reduced to 26 minutes sounds optimistic.
@bobbyowenquiff mentioned integrated systems. That's the key thing, far more than bit part construction and planning. Roads, rail, homes, services for those homes - but it's a risk for any govt. Upset locals due to disruption over many years would be the outcome
What was the whole timescale for the Manchester tram? How long will it be in Leeds? I don't know how much planning has been done for putting the Leeds system in, but it seems likely to be a longterm project which will be hacked around several times.
The guff about "people in London" is a little tedious. I'm sure there are some around the place that only care about their area/commute, but tarring everyone is a bit daft. I expect a very large amount of people would be fully behind better networks in other places, but we don't have a say in it happening. The beneficiaries of much of the work are those living in commuter belt, not London itself.
Bullet train type speed - the UK has very little use for this. The east coast, some of the west coast and maybe some of the GWR have stretched that it could be used, but the UK is small with towns close to each other, and has hills in awkward places for this level. The Eurostar only uses its speed really on the continent.
InterCity speed - something closer to this is probably what's of interest in most places. It will speed up journeys quite enough. To do so will require a lot of digging, but I assume the main issue is that lots of signalling would need ripping out and rebuilding. I guess they can ask Dido to deal with it.
The claim from Johnson this morning that the journey time from Birmingham to Nottingham would be reduced to 26 minutes sounds optimistic.
@bobbyowenquiff mentioned integrated systems. That's the key thing, far more than bit part construction and planning. Roads, rail, homes, services for those homes - but it's a risk for any govt. Upset locals due to disruption over many years would be the outcome
What was the whole timescale for the Manchester tram? How long will it be in Leeds? I don't know how much planning has been done for putting the Leeds system in, but it seems likely to be a longterm project which will be hacked around several times.
The guff about "people in London" is a little tedious. I'm sure there are some around the place that only care about their area/commute, but tarring everyone is a bit daft. I expect a very large amount of people would be fully behind better networks in other places, but we don't have a say in it happening. The beneficiaries of much of the work are those living in commuter belt, not London itself.
The Future’s Blue!
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Dec 2019
- Messages
- 13,357
- Team supported
- City
Diversion tactics. Carry on, pal.