Clyne & Milner we miles better than Clichy and Zabaleta/Clichy/Navas, and it's not even debatable.
Clichy cost us about 5 goals single handedly, and we actually had to resort to Jeusus fucking navas at RB - who was our 6th choice!
Not sure if Pep had any input into Bony purchase but he will for sure have in this case..
I think many are under the impression that Txiki went after players who seemed to have the ability to play in Pep's system. That's only holding the assumption that we were preparing for Pep's inevitable signing for us.Why would Pep have had an input in buying Bony 2 years before Pep arrived?
I don't see how we had the strongest squad last season.
GK's? God no. Spurs, Chelsea, United, Arsenal, Liverpool all better. I'd rank us 6th.
CB's? No. Chelsea & Spurs definitely better. United probably too, 4th at best for us.
Fullbacks? No. Chelsea, Spurs, United, Liverpool better. 6th for us.
Midfield? Maybe. Not definitively though. I'll give us 1st though.
Forwards? Nah - not with Jesus not playing. 3rd.
Depth? Not good.
This season.
GK should be at least on a par with Chelsea, Spurs and better than pool and Arsenal.
CB's won't be as good as Spurs or Chelsea unless Kompany is fit, but if he is there'll be parity.
Fullbacks will be as good as anyone's, if not better. 1st
Midfield is probably still the best. 1st
Forwards are definitely the best. x2 if Sanchez arrives. 1st
Depth? The best by a distance with the likes of Sané, Sterling, Silva, Danilo all likely to see a lot of the bench.
Now we can claim the best squad, last year, no way.
couldn't care less who Evans has played for in the past, I just think he isn't very good and at 29 for the kind of money talked about insanely over-priced
Put it this way how many of us would be happy with a straight swap(at best) Evans for Kelechi Iheanacho? because the bottomline money-wise thats what it looks like it will be
So we wasted our money this Summer then? Guardiola has already explained several times that lion share of the spending this Summer was to bring down the average age of the squad and to replace full backs who were at the end of their careers.Irrespective of individual areas, we had the strongest squad. The fact we finished so far behind Chelsea IMO was not to do with the squads capability, it was simply there didn't perform to that which I believe was Pep's message
GK Can't believe that you think 14 teams had worse goalkeeping than we had last season and that's one hell of a jump considering the weaker of the two goalkeepers is still here this year and the guy who is the replacement has only one full season of football under his belt.
CB basically we are in the same position with Kompany a year older, Konpamy plays 25-30 games we should be OK, if he doesn't Stones will have to step up big time.
FB would pretty much agree
Midfield don't see a huge improvement there might be treading water due to Siva and Yaya being a year older Gundogan getting his 3rd long term injury and KDB's drop off in form last year
Fowards stronger but really shallow
Depth without significant additions in key areas pretty much a wash, but hopefully have at least one shot stopper and fullbacks which might be enough to win us something.
Pragmatic move because we have some cover upfront, but are very exposed in central defence.couldn't care less who Evans has played for in the past, I just think he isn't very good and at 29 for the kind of money talked about insanely over-priced
Put it this way how many of us would be happy with a straight swap(at best) Evans for Kelechi Iheanacho? because the bottomline money-wise thats what it looks like it will be
Seriously, it would probably be safer. A nail bomb going off between two queues would probably get hundreds. Any queue checks have to be quick. Being tied to one entrance does not allow queues to reduce quickly.So you would rather they conduct no checks? Come on, we all want to go there feeling safe dont we
Not quite but I get where you are coming from. There are future benefits if Kelechi does well. He wasn't going to play much here.
Pragmatic move because we have some cover upfront, but are very exposed in central defence.
I don't think that WBA's valuation of Evans has any relevance to us. Let me explain. We have a team of frightening attacking potential and is commonly expected to wipe the floor with opponents, whereas WBA are limited up front and will have no ambition other than PL survival. We ourselves can concede a goal or two but can still win from such a position. WBA will need a tight defence or they will face relegation. If they sell Evans for £30m, they will have to spend that, and more, just to survive. Neither Evans nor Tosin are our own answers but at least our survival in this league is not in doubt whereas Evans' presence is crucial to WBA.As the days and hours slip by the fee becomes less important indeed we may end up paying 30m for him unless an alternative turns up at the last minute which may have to be homegrown. I agree he would be a valuable squad player and I would be interested to see if he has improved since his days at the swamp. WBA seem to rate him highly.
Agree with this.I think Evans would be decent back up to Stones or Kompany should they pick up any injuries. He's a solid defender. Knows the league, European football too. It depends on him if he wants to be a big fish at West Brom, or a squad player. He probably thinks he would prove himself as worthy, which is a win win for City. I doubt the fee would go as high as touted in the press.
We currently have 2 strikers in the squad and 6 cbs.Pragmatic move because we have some cover upfront, but are very exposed in central defence.