Sanchez stands a reasonable chance of winning trophies at Old Toilet, but like you said players are commodities & clubs a source of revenue. I fully understand the stance being taken by City & Sanchez.Players arent like fans. There aren't many players playing for there boyhood team, supposedly Aguero and KDB grew up as Liverpool fans. Fans would play for there club for nothing. In Sanchez case we had agreed a fee and contract. According to the media, he is being paid double to what City had agreed. Being able to run his contract down meant he also got a signing on fee equivalent to the size of a transfer fee. Is that not going for the money. Which I dont blame him as he decided he wanted the money at the rags over trophies here.
Sanchez stands a reasonable chance of winning trophies at Old Toilet, but like you said players are commodities & clubs a source of revenue. I fully understand the stance being taken by City & Sanchez.
He's thinking about the money first & chance to win trophies second, when City want players who have their priorities the other way around. In this respect I fully support our stance, because none of our players look short of a bob or two, & they also have medals to keep a smile on their faces...
That's more that a little subjective, Chelsea are 14 months from being English Champions and pretty much everyone thought they underperformed last year. If the deal comes off then that's good, but I'm sure there is a plan B(although atleast by the sound of things this is already plan B), hopefully we haven't wasted 1000s on hours that could have been deployed more productively elsewhere.Well if a player would rather join a wank side who aren't even in Europe over what looks to be the greatest PL side ever then fuck him.
Nice to see the flappers are out in force as usual CBB.Oh goody , more ammunition for the " Txiki doesn't know how to conduct transfer dealings " brigade , and avid disciples of the " always reliable media "