DaveTheYid said:
Madrid have a miles better team than United and Chelsea.
No comparison.
Well let's break that down a bit.
First of all, you're saying that a team that hasn't made a CL final in around a decade, is currently better than two teams who have contested 5 CL finals since 2008 between them, and won 2 of them? They also both played a CL final in the last 2 seasons consecutively, with Chelsea winning and Utd losing. That doesn't make much sense if football is supposed to be based on results.
Second, we can compare them to find out. I would say United and Chelsea have an overall better defense, especially back 4. Casillas is the only "world class" player in Madrid's defense, whereas at Chelsea for instance you could make arguments for Cole, Cech, Terry, and Ivanovic. Certainly players like Ramos, Pepe, and Arbeloa could be improved upon.
Madrid would have a far more formidable midfield if they manage to get Modric from us, but at the moment Alonso and Khedira form a pretty good midfield but not necessarily better than Scholes and Carrick, or Oscar/Lampard and Ramires.
Madrid do have an outstanding attacking 4, but we also don't know how well Chelsea's attack will gel together. If their new signings are as good as people say, then Oscar, Hazard, Mata, and Torres could be as good as Madrid's front 4. Rooney, Kagawa, Nani, and Valencia is also a very strong looking front 4 and United might get Lucas Moura as well.
So overall I would say there doesn't appear to be much in it for me at least, Madrid don't have the record of results to suggest that they are any better than United/Chelsea though.