Watched the documentary last night, what was the big fuss about them?
Iain Curtis couldn't sing for shit and danced worse than Bez.
What is the appeal? Genuinely want to know what it is.
I've asked this question many a times and people genuinely think they were class!
Ian Curtis' sang like the average person in the shower on a Monday morning after having a mad session the night before, terrible singing! Don't think there's one tune I like and I went through my late teens trying to force myself into listening them.
its not so much about the singing(admittedly its not great) its more about context and placement of the band at the time and as a previous poster has said they were a template for many a post punk band subsequently
plus the music was damm good