You aren't getting Kounde for 40m pounds mate. Maybe 70-85m. I said 100m as an arbitrary number. Obviously we would attempt to get him for less. Our backline would certainly be back to its best with him at RB. Lad is probably just entering his prime. Good luck with the low balling.You talk as if £100m is a trivial amount. It’s not. It is very, very substantial and I would be gutted if we’re, in your words, helping to solve their financial issues by offering such. I couldn’t give a fuck about their dilemma, I’d lowball them to help them out.
If they can afford bignose they can’t be struggling
Does anybody seriously believe that Barca are paying that cunts salary ?
The rags propaganda team have been very busy trying to turd polish the situation caused by Rashford's arrogance allied to limited ability, and all due to their own incompetence in having paid him the salary in the first instance.
What the fuck do Barca nee d the **** for seriously ?
I don’t want him. I’m pretty certain we won’t be offering anything like your £70m- £80m either. Thank fuck you’re not in charge of transfers at City.You aren't getting Kounde for 40m pounds mate. Maybe 70-85m. I said 100m as an arbitrary number. Obviously we would attempt to get him for less. Our backline would certainly be back to its best with him at RB. Lad is probably just entering his prime. Good luck with the low balling.
Sounds like what the rags say about us that we laugh at them forI have a conspiracy theory.. every time someone buys drugs or companions in Barca.. that money goes to the mob and the mob pays for the players off the books.
I mean Gundo went and played there on 100k a week but we pay him 230k a week? Something really stinks..
Respectfully mate - nobody cares if TonyColemansbagofapples doesn't want a player. He's very likely the best right back in the world (him & Hakimi IMO), while also being hugely marketable. The position is also extremely scarce. City would easily pay £75m for this lad if that's all it took.I don’t want him. I’m pretty certain we won’t be offering anything like your £70m- £80m either. Thank fuck you’re not in charge of transfers at City.
I’m well aware of where my opinion stands. However, you’re probably on your own offering £100m.Respectfully mate - nobody cares if TonyColemansfagofapples doesn't want a player. He's very likely the best right back in the world (him & Hakimi IMO), while also being hugely marketable. The position is also extremely scarce. City would easily pay £75m for this lad if that's all it took.
Reports indicate we were happy to make our INITIAL offer for Tino Liv £65m. Yes he's younger and home grown, but he would have to take massive strides to be Kounde's level. Give your head a shake.
Sounds like what the rags say about us that we laugh at them for
In my opinion he isn’t but I guess playing for Barcelona or Madrid makes you better than you are ( Rodrygo).Is he better than Dumfries or Vanderson ?
We need to sell regardlessEnglish goalkeeper to make room for foreign right back?
I thought he was 24/25 when I said that number, which I already stated was arbitrary. It was to get the point across that an offer too good to refuse would likely help both parties in this situation.I’m well aware of where my opinion stands. However, you’re probably on your own offering £100m.
And I very highly doubt City would pay £75m
I’m well aware of where my opinion stands. However, you’re probably on your own offering £100m.
And I very highly doubt City would pay £75m