Delphacito
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Jan 2016
- Messages
- 1,703
Let’s just say Van Dijk’s last season with Southampton was mediocre at best. Look how that turned out...
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Kalidou Koulibaly
- Thread starter Matt Diablo
- Start date
Van Dijk was 26.Let’s just say Van Dijk’s last season with Southampton was mediocre at best. Look how that turned out...
Koulibaly is 29.
Delphacito
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Jan 2016
- Messages
- 1,703
29 is prime age for defenders. Think Vinnie from 5 years ago, was it a bad age?Van Dijk was 26.
Koulibaly is 29.
simon23
Well-Known Member
Suely even for 3-4 seasons this guy would be worth it.......And we wouldnt have to play him every game either - Garcia is really showing that he can handle it. then there is Laporte ans we could even keep Stones. 4 decent centre halves to rotate around (Or do we need another left sided defender to cover Laporte?
Delphacito
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Jan 2016
- Messages
- 1,703
Koulibaly plays on the left side for Napoli even though he’s right footed. So he can cover for Laporte as well.Suely even for 3-4 seasons this guy would be worth it.......And we wouldnt have to play him every game either - Garcia is really showing that he can handle it. then there is Laporte ans we could even keep Stones. 4 decent centre halves to rotate around (Or do we need another left sided defender to cover Laporte?
Some people questioning age, I would say we would be getting a player in his prime for 4/5 years!
We could for example sign Holgate, who may or may not be a risk?!.....but could walk away at the end of his contract anyway so the age thing is potentially irrelevant.
We could for example sign Holgate, who may or may not be a risk?!.....but could walk away at the end of his contract anyway so the age thing is potentially irrelevant.
Got to be our main target, Koulibaly and Laporte would be a great partnership. But don't trust De Laurentis at all.The most recent report from Castles who while admittedly a twat has been on this before anyone else (is there a Mendes connection?) Says Napoli will accept 40m up front with 10-15m in add ons.
In my book that takes this from "no-brainer" to "what the fuck are you waiting for, quick, quick before they change their minds!" Territory.
Otamendi's Beard
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 Jul 2007
- Messages
- 3,934
The most recent report from Castles who while admittedly a twat has been on this before anyone else (is there a Mendes connection?) Says Napoli will accept 40m up front with 10-15m in add ons.
In my book that takes this from "no-brainer" to "what the fuck are you waiting for, quick, quick before they change their minds!" Territory.
If we got him anywhere near that price it would be a truly excellent signing.
This is a disingenuous comparison. Van Dyke was rated #1 Defender on Whoscored and the #3 defender on Sqwaka at the end of the 2016-2017 season.Let’s just say Van Dijk’s last season with Southampton was mediocre at best. Look how that turned out...
He then put in a transfer request in August of 17. A request Southampton balked at. Making the first half of the 2017-18 season saga between club and player. He ended up playing just 11 games. Still averaged a 7.10 on Whoscored for those games. Sure it was a drop from his 7.35 of the 16-17 full season.
Even if you considered those 11 games his 'last season' in Southhampton, 'Mediocre' is a stretch as a descriptor. That 7,10 rating would be good enough for #7 defender this year. Granted, this is a down year for defenders. But mediocre does not describe any season Van Dyke had.
Other than that, everything else you said was okay :)