You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Kate Middleton Topless
- Thread starter rickmcfc
- Start date
BimboBob
Well-Known Member
bobmcfc said:danburge82 said:Why? She's just another person. They photographed Gail Tydsley so why not this bird?bobmcfc said:Shameful for them to publish those photos.
I gave my reasons further along in the thread. The fact is these photos were taken from over a mile away from a private estate.
Come now fake Bob, if you were one of the world's most photographed persons and had cameramen chasing you at every moment of the day looking for that one big picture would you get your wally jumblats out on the off chance that no one sees you?
Of course you wouldn't.
She's been both naive and a little bit stupid if you ask me. Mind you, the amount of stories and news time taken up by this "item" is very OTT. I don't care. Nor do most of my mates.
Forzacitizens
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 5,126
War should be declared on the frenchies for showing our future Queen exposed.
BimboBob
Well-Known Member
Forzacitizens said:War should be declared on the frenchies for showing our future Queen exposed.
The Ities are now going to print it as well. Let's declare war on them. Bloody spics...
cockneycarparkm32
Well-Known Member
bobmcfc said:danburge82 said:Why? She's just another person. They photographed Gail Tydsley so why not this bird?bobmcfc said:Shameful for them to publish those photos.
I gave my reasons further along in the thread. The fact is these photos were taken from over a mile away from a private estate.
Sadly there is market that people will pay good money to see two small fried eggs , the press are making their point about freedom
we dont have to look, we dont have to buy , there are more important things going on in the world , its tommorows chip paper . Funny how Harry was of to Afghan after his antics in Vegas , boring .
BimboBob said:bobmcfc said:danburge82 said:Why? She's just another person. They photographed Gail Tydsley so why not this bird?
I gave my reasons further along in the thread. The fact is these photos were taken from over a mile away from a private estate.
Come now fake Bob, if you were one of the world's most photographed persons and had cameramen chasing you at every moment of the day looking for that one big picture would you get your wally jumblats out on the off chance that no one sees you?
Of course you wouldn't.
She's been both naive and a little bit stupid if you ask me. Mind you, the amount of stories and news time taken up by this "item" is very OTT. I don't care. Nor do most of my mates.
I think the royals work closely with the media and have an understanding with most Of the media to provide pictures and be allowed a degree of privacy when on holidays. And. A lot of our press agree not to infringe on intimate private moments. It's common decency in the fist place but I guess these leeches only want to make as much money as they can, similar to the night Diana died really.
Cellarite
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Jan 2010
- Messages
- 26,010
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Forzacitizens said:War should be declared on the frenchies for showing our future Queen exposed.
Aah, I like it. Hit them on the surprise? The best form of defence is attack? Class. The Channel Tunnel means that we can have thousands over there before they realise what's going on.
Why Always Ste
Well-Known Member
When I heard about this story I was expecting she had done some proper posing pictures, not this?
The Royal PR Dept. have overhyped this purposely, trying to humanize these scum, same with the Harry naked pic - oooh you sure this was sneakily sent to the press?
if they would of kept quiet and not said anything most of the country wouldn't of even been aware of these pictures.
The Royal PR Dept. have overhyped this purposely, trying to humanize these scum, same with the Harry naked pic - oooh you sure this was sneakily sent to the press?
if they would of kept quiet and not said anything most of the country wouldn't of even been aware of these pictures.
jimharri
Moderator
Scum?Why Always Ste said:When I heard about this story I was expecting she had done some proper posing pictures, not this?
The Royal PR Dept. have overhyped this purposely, trying to humanize these scum, same with the Harry naked pic - oooh you sure this was sneakily sent to the press?
if they would of kept quiet and not said anything most of the country wouldn't of even been aware of these pictures.
Colliahhh
Well-Known Member
BimboBob said:Forzacitizens said:War should be declared on the frenchies for showing our future Queen exposed.
The Ities are now going to print it as well. Let's declare war on them. Bloody spics...
And the Irish are at it too, lets take that prime real estate back!
Got to say her baps leave much to be desired.
Although they are more or less identical in shape and size to some girl I used to see who was also properly posh.
I've got the foundations to a conspiracy theory here!