KDB or Haaland?

Only on here would the eejits be rating a guy who has been here for about 10 weeks over a legend who will end up doing 10 years
Close this stinking shitheap of a fucking abortion of thread
Tbf the original title which was about 12 paragraphs wasn’t as straight forward as just a choice between the two players. It asked if both at their prime at the same age who would you prefer. Understandably Kev is most posters choice due to what he’s done for City over the years and Haaland only just walking through the door.
My preference for Haaland in this instance is down to the fact I think in his prime, there won’t be anywhere near him in football and the records he will break will mark him down as one of the very best lo have played the game.
It’s no slight on Kev, we all have our own ideas on what type of player we enjoy.
 
Like is said his numbers are good, but as again I said I will judge him when we play teams that we may only get 1 or 2 good chances in a game and he turns them chances into 3 points as KDB as done for a long time now
 
If they were both the same age, and both at the peak of their ability who would you choose out of KDB vs Haaland if you could only have one?

I’m really torn but I’d have to say KBD just.
de Bruyne then Bernardo
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.