Tbf the original title which was about 12 paragraphs wasn’t as straight forward as just a choice between the two players. It asked if both at their prime at the same age who would you prefer. Understandably Kev is most posters choice due to what he’s done for City over the years and Haaland only just walking through the door.Only on here would the eejits be rating a guy who has been here for about 10 weeks over a legend who will end up doing 10 years
Close this stinking shitheap of a fucking abortion of thread
My preference for Haaland in this instance is down to the fact I think in his prime, there won’t be anywhere near him in football and the records he will break will mark him down as one of the very best lo have played the game.
It’s no slight on Kev, we all have our own ideas on what type of player we enjoy.