Cityisland
Well-Known Member
Is there a shelf life to this option or duration of contract?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Kelechi Iheanacho
- Thread starter cadds92
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Is there a shelf life to this option or duration of contract?
Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
This transfer alone funds £125m of our in year transfer spend (based on 5 year deals) it's been a while since we've had a windfall like this to benefit our outgoings.
Come again mate?
goalmole
Well-Known Member
This transfer alone funds £125m of our in year transfer spend (based on 5 year deals) it's been a while since we've had a windfall like this to benefit our outgoings.Come again mate?
TheThirdDeano
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 8,764
That's a good point. The two aren't related are they?Santa Cruz did!
We can but hope Leciester Medical department = Circa 2009 Manchester city levels
warpig
Well-Known Member
£35m sounds about right.
That's what we were quoting West Ham the other week, which was basically City demanding we could buy Nacho back at around 40 per cent on top of his sale price.
Good move by City.
£35m is an outstanding piece of business.
tolmie's hairdoo
Well-Known Member
Is there a shelf life to this option or duration of contract?
Would assume the length of the original contract.
City do seem to be very creative these days.
Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
This transfer alone funds £125m of our in year transfer spend (based on 5 year deals) it's been a while since we've had a windfall like this to benefit our outgoings.
Nope still cant get my nut round it.
tolmie's hairdoo
Well-Known Member
£35m is an outstanding piece of business.
You do understand that's to buy him back, fella?
Based on the supposed sale figure being correct at £25m?
So will only cost us £10m.
cleavers
Moderator
Benefits all parties, Leicester aren't spending £25m+ on someone they're not going to use, Kelechi gets major playing time in the PL, and City can get him back if he is a success, to keep, or sell on for more.
We got him for next to nothing, so are basically making a £25m profit on that, he will hopefully develop further with decent playing time, if he does, we can take him back when we need him.
We got him for next to nothing, so are basically making a £25m profit on that, he will hopefully develop further with decent playing time, if he does, we can take him back when we need him.
This transfer alone funds £125m of our in year transfer spend (based on 5 year deals) it's been a while since we've had a windfall like this to benefit our outgoings.
Who's to say we got the full £25M upfront?
- Status
- Not open for further replies.