Key Bridge, Baltimore, has collapsed.

It shows how much the economy could be affected by the way Biden came out straight away and said were paying to fix it.
Biden (and trump) will be dead by the time they start rebuilding this bridge, it'll be years before they can, it's going to take months to reopen the port, never mind start building a bridge again.
 
1000013443-jpg.111739

Looks like a really low budget album cover.
 
Biden (and trump) will be dead by the time they start rebuilding this bridge, it'll be years before they can, it's going to take months to reopen the port, never mind start building a bridge again.
I beg to differ. I think they’ll clear the high bridge section of debris as soon as the rescue-recovery-removal is complete and they’ll open the waterway. It’s too important to the jobs in the city and too much money would be lost by dilly-dallying on reopening the deep water channel.

I have no civil engineering background, but I did stay at Holiday Inn Express last night (a joke for the Americans!).
 
I beg to differ. I think they’ll clear the high bridge section of debris as soon as the rescue-recovery-removal is complete and they’ll open the waterway. It’s too important to the jobs in the city and too much money would be lost by dilly-dallying on reopening the deep water channel.
They'll obviously open the port as soon as they can economically, but they'll have to clear the mess out of the way first, that'll probably need a salvage company. The ship will likely need refloating, it could be badly damaged under the water, then they'll have to do some serious checks under the water to make sure the channel is still viable, it may need dredging after several days/weeks with no ship movements as its tidal, so every 6 hours, water and sediment move back and forth, I don't know what the tidal spread is.

On the bridge rebuild, they'll still have the concrete piers to build on, so that could help.
 
They'll obviously open the port as soon as they can economically, but they'll have to clear the mess out of the way first, that'll probably need a salvage company. The ship will likely need refloating, it could be badly damaged under the water, then they'll have to do some serious checks under the water to make sure the channel is still viable, it may need dredging after several days/weeks with no ship movements as its tidal, so every 6 hours, water and sediment move back and forth, I don't know what the tidal spread is.

On the bridge rebuild, they'll still have the concrete piers to build on, so that could help.
You sound like you have me at a disadvantage with your knowledge, so I’ll defer to you on the requirements for any reopening of the channel.

However, as the outer harbor bridge, it has shutdown a very active east coast port which will be doing everything in its power to open asap.
 
I beg to differ. I think they’ll clear the high bridge section of debris as soon as the rescue-recovery-removal is complete and they’ll open the waterway. It’s too important to the jobs in the city and too much money would be lost by dilly-dallying on reopening the deep water channel.

I have no civil engineering background, but I did stay at Holiday Inn Express last night (a joke for the Americans!).

That would be my thought. The central channel should be clearable reasonably quickly - well, as soon as a ship with a really big crane can get there.
 
You sound like you have me at a disadvantage with your knowledge
I'm only going by what I can see to be honest, I'm certainly not an expert, so it's mostly commen sense.

Hoever it's a big ship, a quick google shows it extends nearly 40 feet below the waterline, fully loaded, so the channel is likely to be at least 60 feet below the bridge where the ship movements take place.

From the pictures of the remains of the bridge, most of the estuary doesn't look too deep, much of the bridge seems to be resting in fairly shallow water.

To get big ships in and out there will be a deeper channel as I mentioned above (it may not be the biggest ship that go into that port), and tides move a huge amount of water in and out of an estuary, and it's quite a wide one.

Now there are under water "structures" (the bridge damege) which will collect sediment until they can dredge the channel, and they are big structures impeding the flow (not mention the ship until they can move it).
 
Apparently the ship (and potentially crew) was previously involved in a collision incident in Antwerp in 2016.

surely it’s not that hard to avoid two giant pillars covered in warning lights supporting a giant bridge, unless they let a woman steer it for a bet
 
surely it’s not that hard to avoid two giant pillars covered in warning lights supporting a giant bridge, unless they let a woman steer it for a bet
The ship lost power twice before hitting the bridge. The pilots who were in charge stood no chance, hence dropping the anchors in a last ditch attempt to slow it down
 
I saw it on the news at about 7am this morning before I went to work. Just seen it now in "real time".....the one this morning must have been shown in slow motion.
Awful.
Thankfully a Mayday was put out, because that is horrific.
 
What sort of distance would be required for a ship of that size, laden with that weight, going at whatever speed it was travelling, to change course sufficiently to avoid such a collision? And yes; I realise it's not like steering a Daewoo Matiz. The sheer weight of the vessel would be propelling it forward, making "steering" a very gradual process.
 
What sort of distance would be required for a ship of that size, laden with that weight, going at whatever speed it was travelling, to change course sufficiently to avoid such a collision? And yes; I realise it's not like steering a Daewoo Matiz. The sheer weight of the vessel would be propelling it forward, making "steering" a very gradual process.
A lot more time than they had after the power loss ;-)
 
What sort of distance would be required for a ship of that size, laden with that weight, going at whatever speed it was travelling, to change course sufficiently to avoid such a collision? And yes; I realise it's not like steering a Daewoo Matiz. The sheer weight of the vessel would be propelling it forward, making "steering" a very gradual process.

It's difficult to know as most stopping distances assume you can put engines to astern. And tides, etc. Also no-one really considers an inertial stop option.

It was doing 8 knots (I think this was said this morning) - but without power, about 1.5-2 miles nautical miles, I think.

has a ship half the length at 10 knots travelling 2 nautical miles.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top