should have given him the mic at the parade instead of the cringe inducing bloke.As a side issue, why do we never see more of Chris Bailey? He gets the Khaldoon interview then nothing. He’s good at what he does.
If I'm not mistaken their sleeve sponsor is western union who've also done a little laundering of their ownLaundering money is a speciality of Liverpool's main sponsors Standard Chartered. They've even been fined $1.5 billion for doing for those nice people in Iran.
Things are never going to be how they were again for City, and probably for European football, I reckon. This is a genuine line in the sand moment. It's going to escalate and escalate and it'll change a lot of things.
There's an interesting line towards the end of the Daily Mail coverage of Khaldoon's comments. It says the clubs who were pushing the Premier League to investigate City for FFP (as well as UEFA) were those with American owners. That information was not in the original story in the Times which just referred to "Premier League clubs". That information leaves little doubt that Liverpool and United are the people who Khaldoon is referencing when he talks about "briefing against us." It can only be Gill and Parry or someone acting for them. The Daily Mail may have mistakenly outed one of their own sources with this paragraph.Now that was a real gloves off, line in the sand big fuck you to all the bent bastards in UEFA, Tebas, Gill, Parry, the arch hypocrite John Henry, etc. Now we need Khaldoon to give notice to the gutter press including the holier than thou hypocritical bloggers, tweeters and liars that if you fuck with us any more we're going to seriously fuck with you.
Khaldoon you legend!
Take a screenshot of it before they change it.There's an interesting line towards the end of the Daily Mail coverage of Khaldoon's comments. It says the clubs who were pushing the Premier League to investigate City for FFP (as well as UEFA) were those with American owners. That information was not in the original story in the Times which just referred to "Premier League clubs". That information leaves little doubt that Liverpool and United are the people who Khaldoon is referencing when he talks about "briefing against us." It can only be Gill and Parry or someone acting for them. The Daily Mail may have mistakenly outed one of their own sources with this paragraph.
Still got the impression that regardless of ‘facts’ they are expecting sanctions... it’s needs to be challenged at the highest level this time, with a mission to end Uefa once and for all!
Manchester City chief launches scathing attack on club critics https://mol.im/a/7072779 via http://dailym.ai/androidTake a screenshot of it before they change it.
There's an interesting line towards the end of the Daily Mail coverage of Khaldoon's comments. It says the clubs who were pushing the Premier League to investigate City for FFP (as well as UEFA) were those with American owners. That information was not in the original story in the Times which just referred to "Premier League clubs". That information leaves little doubt that Liverpool and United are the people who Khaldoon is referencing when he talks about "briefing against us." It can only be Gill and Parry or someone acting for them. The Daily Mail may have mistakenly outed one of their own sources with this paragraph.
I’ll hold my hands up to that!Think there's only 1 silly member on here at the moment and it's not me ;)
He said we were confident as long as the enquiry was going to be based on facts, but added a hanging proviso to the effect that what might happen if it weren’t based on facts, was in the lap of the Gods. So not quite the same as “we have nothing to fear”.
Personally I don’t think there was much in that interview of consequence, if only because he clearly wasn’t able to discuss anything specific that might relate to the UEFA enquiry. Tebas was an easy, legitimate and deserved target, but other than that, as regards off-field matters, the relaxed ambience felt a bit forced IMO. I do know I wouldn’t want to mess with him though. There was a definite steeliness there. On the field stuff, where he could be more loquacious, was good.