Khaldoons End of Season Interview

[BringBackSwales]

“Doubts over treble” is the bbc football headline, slyman fucking stones. I detest that ****

 

[Ducado]

I think it was quite telling that he DID NOT say that we are innocent of all charges and that we will be fully vindicated through the legal process. Why did he NOT say that, I wonder?

I can think of three reasons.

1. Our lawyers have told him to say nothing. There's nothing to be read into it, it's just a good policy to say nothing in case anything you do say may be taken out of context or even damage your case in some way, so silence is the safe option. Quite possible, IMO.

2. He's aware of developments in the case which he cannot comment upon, such as we're reaching agreement to get all serious charges dropped provided we agree to a slapped wrist for trivial non-compliance such as not providing required documentation? Again, possible, IMO.

3. He knows we're in a tight spot and doesn't want to look like a prat by telling everyone we're completely innocent only to be found guilty on some counts later. And OBVIOUSLY he can't say well we're probably guilty on some counts. So he has to say nothing.

I really do not know how to read it, but I do think his silence on the matter is significant. I am inclined to think (2) above, if I had to pick.

It's standard practice not to say anything about on going matters there was nothing to read into what he said, he is not going to give the world a blow by blow account of what is happening as much as we would like him to do

 

[Ducado]

“Doubts over treble” is the bbc football headline, slyman fucking stones. I detest that ****

That's not really the headline though is it

 

[nmc]

i still piss myself when swales say's" you know would'd do a job for us now the one we just got rid off"

Yes that’s excruciating. It was Asa he was referring to I think.

 

[Coatigan]

I’m sure the chairman does not interfere with such matters. Good thing too.

My point was more that it maybe isn't much to read into, either way.

 

[Centurions]

I think it was quite telling that he DID NOT say that we are innocent of all charges and that we will be fully vindicated through the legal process. Why did he NOT say that, I wonder?

I can think of three reasons.

1. Our lawyers have told him to say nothing. There's nothing to be read into it, it's just a good policy to say nothing in case anything you do say may be taken out of context or even damage your case in some way, so silence is the safe option. Quite possible, IMO.

2. He's aware of developments in the case which he cannot comment upon, such as we're reaching agreement to get all serious charges dropped provided we agree to a slapped wrist for trivial non-compliance such as not providing required documentation? Again, possible, IMO.

3. He knows we're in a tight spot and doesn't want to look like a prat by telling everyone we're completely innocent only to be found guilty on some counts later. And OBVIOUSLY he can't say well we're probably guilty on some counts. So he has to say nothing.

I really do not know how to read it, but I do think his silence on the matter is significant. I am inclined to think (2) above, if I had to pick.

Option 1 all day long and twice on Sundays. You're chasing your tail trying to read anything else into it.

 

[Centurions]

“Doubts over treble” is the bbc football headline, slyman fucking stones. I detest that ****

Did you forget to scroll down?

 

[Blue Maverick]

114. We will be found not to have co-operated. That is the PL’s fig leaf.

It’s multiple counts of-non cooperation but fuck em all.

 

[adjb]

I think it was quite telling that he DID NOT say that we are innocent of all charges and that we will be fully vindicated through the legal process. Why did he NOT say that, I wonder?

I can think of three reasons.

1. Our lawyers have told him to say nothing. There's nothing to be read into it, it's just a good policy to say nothing in case anything you do say may be taken out of context or even damage your case in some way, so silence is the safe option. Quite possible, IMO.

2. He's aware of developments in the case which he cannot comment upon, such as we're reaching agreement to get all serious charges dropped provided we agree to a slapped wrist for trivial non-compliance such as not providing required documentation? Again, possible, IMO.

3. He knows we're in a tight spot and doesn't want to look like a prat by telling everyone we're completely innocent only to be found guilty on some counts later. And OBVIOUSLY he can't say well we're probably guilty on some counts. So he has to say nothing.

I really do not know how to read it, but I do think his silence on the matter is significant. I am inclined to think (2) above, if I had to pick.

He wouldn’t be allowed to comment in any eventuality because it’s an ongoing investigation. No reading into it to be done, he (or any club officials) won’t comment until it’s concluded.

 

[Kirkstall Blue]

Unbelievable chairman love the man I have every confidence in him. Gundogan has to make big decisions I hope he decides to stay.

Frustrating, for legal reason he can’t talk about the charges