Kolarov and Johnson, the key to winning the league

nashark said:
As the title says, I think these two players will be crucial to our success, and are excellent players to have in any squad.

Against the top teams, we won't have a problem. I don't doubt that when United come to Manchester, we'll turn them over. But United are better than us at breaking down the lesser teams. They get the ball wide, lump it into the box and wait for the double deflection which allows them to score.

We are more precise about our build up play, which allows us to be better than the top teams (because if you lose the ball easily from firing in crosses, you don't get it back), but occasionally means we struggle against the lesser teams, as we found out against West Brom, Sunderland and Everton.

The solution to this difficulty comes in Kolarov and Johnson, two players able to make something happen when retaining the ball is getting us nowhere.

When we play Clichy, it should be against the top sides. He's a top player, a better defender than Kolarov, but not a better attacker. For us to break down the teams which are content with 10 men behind the ball, we have to sacrifice the additional defensive security that he brings for Kolarov's superior attacking, crossing, and set-piece ability. Clichy's a fit player, but when we switch the play and get him in, he doesn't have Kolarov's capacity to harm the opposition. It's great that we have him, and he's an excellent signing, but Kolarov should play against the lesser teams.

(I know Kolarov started against Sunderland, but was just returning from injury at the time).

As for Johnson, he should play ahead of Nasri against the lesser teams for the following reasons:

He plays further wide than Nasri which stretches the opposition defence, creating more gaps for Dave and Serge to exploit.

When Nasri plays, he holds onto the ball too long, allowing teams to get back behind the ball. It's good that he can do this which makes him a great player to have as a substitute or against the better teams when we need to take the sting out of the game. But against the lesser teams, Johnson makes things happen. He can beat a man, he has a great shot. And when we can recover the ball easily from a wearied opposition should we lose it, we can deal with him trying to beat the defender.

Given that they both played against Fulham, Villa and Blackburn, hopefully Bobby Manc is starting to see it the same way.

They get far too much abuse from City fans (if BM's anything to go by) which will hopefully change once they realise their importance in breaking down the lesser teams, which will be the key to us winning the league.

It's a really good post. Great to see a decent football post on here. I totally agree about Nasri, and I agree that AJ is ultimately more dangerous for the reasons you've given: momentum and speed of break. Whilst AJ is patchy, he hurts teams. He makes things happen. Nasri, whilst he doesn't really have bad games, he doesn't make things happen, he slows things up with his square passing.

Look at our first and last goals at the weekend. End to end stuff. From our box to the opposition's in three seconds and three passes. That's what you get with Nasri not involved.

Kolorov, I take your point, but he is always second option for me against a team with any attacking threat.
 
Kolarov's cross towards Dzeko's header recently was priceless.

We just need another player, like Kolarov on the other end who is capable of crossing and we're set.
 
cleavers said:
The only flaw in the argument is that Johnson rarely crosses, because he's on his wrong foot every (rare) time he beats a fullback. He played well on Saturday, but he put in next to no decent crosses, he rarely does.

Probably very much in the minority but I thought he was actually our weakest player against Blackburn. Not awful, mind you, but noticeably off everyone elses level.
 
Kolorov can't defend. He'd make a good winger, though, should we decide we need some width. Particularly for away games.
 
SuperKevinHorlock91 said:
As long as we match rags results we will win te league. Simple. Let's just Concerntrate on our own games instead of theirs. That's their job to worry about us!

and beating them in April will be huge - especially if we're very close in points, that's going to be one hell of a game

(although I hope Spurs stuff ManUre at the weekend, and then they go on to drop points and implode long before the season finishes, so we might run away with it with fistfuls of points in hand, ah yes.. ehehe)
 
Didsbury Dave said:
It's a really good post. Great to see a decent football post on here. I totally agree about Nasri, and I agree that AJ is ultimately more dangerous for the reasons you've given: momentum and speed of break. Whilst AJ is patchy, he hurts teams. He makes things happen. Nasri, whilst he doesn't really have bad games, he doesn't make things happen, he slows things up with his square passing.

Look at our first and last goals at the weekend. End to end stuff. From our box to the opposition's in three seconds and three passes. That's what you get with Nasri not involved.....

laughQAF.gif
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.