pudge said:How badly do you want to be Mrs. Kolarov lolbzekosilva said:the papers are usually the ones to crit harshly on our players kolarov has had amazing write ups and scored. its seems the judge and jury are here. blind,
ban-mcfc said:Balti said:the famed free kick
at last!
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qxsltn8l1wY[/youtube]
goaliecane1 said:Kolarov has had his ups and downs, however he does have a cracking left foot and provides very dangerous crosses everytime he gets in...clichy would have been my first choice though
Yes, I'd agree the selection of both second choice fullbacks was a mistake . I also felt the addition oftevez and withdrawal of dzeko was an error too. We finally had some width and were getting balls into the box. Why take off the target man?Comrade Buka said:goaliecane1 said:Kolarov has had his ups and downs, however he does have a cracking left foot and provides very dangerous crosses everytime he gets in...clichy would have been my first choice though
The 2 times he did get in a cross during the entire match? Yes, I counted.
2 crosses in 75 minutes is a joke. In a team with no wingers. If you can't see that, then Kolarov is probably one of the best left backs in the world.
Zabaletas wing play was equally shite.
Didsbury Dave said:Yes, I'd agree the selection of both second choice fullbacks was a mistake . I also felt the addition oftevez and withdrawal of dzeko was an error too. We finally had some width and were getting balls into the box. Why take off the target man?Comrade Buka said:goaliecane1 said:Kolarov has had his ups and downs, however he does have a cracking left foot and provides very dangerous crosses everytime he gets in...clichy would have been my first choice though
The 2 times he did get in a cross during the entire match? Yes, I counted.
2 crosses in 75 minutes is a joke. In a team with no wingers. If you can't see that, then Kolarov is probably one of the best left backs in the world.
Zabaletas wing play was equally shite.
Comrade Buka said:Didsbury Dave said:Yes, I'd agree the selection of both second choice fullbacks was a mistake . I also felt the addition oftevez and withdrawal of dzeko was an error too. We finally had some width and were getting balls into the box. Why take off the target man?Comrade Buka said:The 2 times he did get in a cross during the entire match? Yes, I counted.
2 crosses in 75 minutes is a joke. In a team with no wingers. If you can't see that, then Kolarov is probably one of the best left backs in the world.
Zabaletas wing play was equally shite.
Damn straight about Dzeko. Why put on two wingers, Clichy and Johnson and have them aim for the giant dwarf Tevez?
Zabaleta did not challenge his counter part even once. Yes, I watched the whole thing with that in mind - he didn't challenge a single time. Anyone seeing Richards being equally timid? I doubt it. Richards is like a fucking force of nature, equally terrifying as Toure when he gets his speed up.
If I could only replace ONE of the fullbacks yesterday, it would be Zabaleta for Richards. Zab's attacking play was atrocious. While Kolarov's attacking play was non-existent. Not sure which is worse.
Seosa said:Comrade Buka said:Didsbury Dave said:Yes, I'd agree the selection of both second choice fullbacks was a mistake . I also felt the addition oftevez and withdrawal of dzeko was an error too. We finally had some width and were getting balls into the box. Why take off the target man?
Damn straight about Dzeko. Why put on two wingers, Clichy and Johnson and have them aim for the giant dwarf Tevez?
Zabaleta did not challenge his counter part even once. Yes, I watched the whole thing with that in mind - he didn't challenge a single time. Anyone seeing Richards being equally timid? I doubt it. Richards is like a fucking force of nature, equally terrifying as Toure when he gets his speed up.
If I could only replace ONE of the fullbacks yesterday, it would be Zabaleta for Richards. Zab's attacking play was atrocious. While Kolarov's attacking play was non-existent. Not sure which is worse.
Zabs was one of our best players yet you would've dropped him and kept Kolarov on? Jesus wept...
Grand Master Ram Rod said:He might have got the goal but he's still the weak link. We all know he can't defend but seriously what does he offer going forward as well?
Gives the ball away every time, shoots when he should pass (and that ends up in row Z), can't tackle, always out of position.
Clichy and Zab from now on, give Kolarov a go in the Carling Cup or something.
He's the weak link and we all know it, not good enough for us now.
Comrade Buka said:Seosa said:Comrade Buka said:Damn straight about Dzeko. Why put on two wingers, Clichy and Johnson and have them aim for the giant dwarf Tevez?
Zabaleta did not challenge his counter part even once. Yes, I watched the whole thing with that in mind - he didn't challenge a single time. Anyone seeing Richards being equally timid? I doubt it. Richards is like a fucking force of nature, equally terrifying as Toure when he gets his speed up.
If I could only replace ONE of the fullbacks yesterday, it would be Zabaleta for Richards. Zab's attacking play was atrocious. While Kolarov's attacking play was non-existent. Not sure which is worse.
Zabs was one of our best players yet you would've dropped him and kept Kolarov on? Jesus wept...
Explain to me exactly how Zab was one of our best players? Because other than your opinion I saw no evidence of it watching the game. 3 times, now. His defending was ok, his forward runs were non existent and his crossing was poor.
Jesus wept for the blind.