The ones online show Kyle Walker as a middle aged white man, and they get "no shoot Vinny" wrong.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Kompany & Silva Statues
- Thread starter MAG
- Start date
It’s laughable how that film has convinced people the Scots wore the same war paint as the Picts, didn’t wear sheeted armour and weren’t a highly organised and equipped army, that would have looked similar to the English on the battlefield.Brechin FC have unveiled a new Braveheart statue, it's marvelous.... NotView attachment 25881
I saw a history Professor rate Braveheart 1 out of 10 for historical accuracy recently. The 1 was because some of the named characters did actually exist and there was a war, nothing else.
kun
Well-Known Member
Pretty sure he shags Isabella of France in that film. She was 10 years old when Wallace died.It’s laughable how that film has convinced people the Scots wore the same war paint as the Picts, didn’t wear sheeted armour and weren’t a highly organised and equipped army, that would have looked similar to the English on the battlefield.
I saw a history Professor rate Braveheart 1 out of 10 for historical accuracy recently. The 1 was because some of the named characters did actually exist and there was a war, nothing else.
Bluesince1979
Well-Known Member
HollywoodIt’s laughable how that film has convinced people the Scots wore the same war paint as the Picts, didn’t wear sheeted armour and weren’t a highly organised and equipped army, that would have looked similar to the English on the battlefield.
I saw a history Professor rate Braveheart 1 out of 10 for historical accuracy recently. The 1 was because some of the named characters did actually exist and there was a war, nothing else.
Yes and thus insinuating Edward II was Wallace’s love child. Edward was born 7 years after Wallace was killed.Pretty sure he shags Isabella of France in that film. She was 10 years old when Wallace died.
The worst bit is the film starts with “historians in England will call me a liar” as narration… then literally 10 seconds later gets wrong the date Alexander III king of Scotland dies.
Last edited:
eyalluvitt
Well-Known Member
Nicoliar Sturgeon doesn't have the historical dates to hand or recall when she saw the film but is sure it is 100% accurate as it catapulted her from failed lawyer into government.Yes and thus insinuating Edward II was Wallace’s love child. Edward was born 7 years after Wallace was killed.
The worst bit is the film starts with “historians in England will call me a liar” as narration… then literally 10 seconds later gets wrong the date Alexander III king of Scotland dies.
I've just literrally saw it yesterday (at 4:58)It’s laughable how that film has convinced people the Scots wore the same war paint as the Picts, didn’t wear sheeted armour and weren’t a highly organised and equipped army, that would have looked similar to the English on the battlefield.
I saw a history Professor rate Braveheart 1 out of 10 for historical accuracy recently. The 1 was because some of the named characters did actually exist and there was a war, nothing else.
To be fair to the movie, he said "2 out of 10, or 1 out of 10", not an absolute 1/10 :D
I've just literrally saw it yesterday (at 4:58)
To be fair to the movie, he said "2 out of 10, or 1 out of 10", not an absolute 1/10 :D
You’ve got good tastes :-)
dickie davies
Well-Known Member
What's Barry Fry got to do with it?Brechin FC have unveiled a new Braveheart statue, it's marvelous.... NotView attachment 25881
And the man himself was just a border raider, stealing and killing at random. Some hero!It’s laughable how that film has convinced people the Scots wore the same war paint as the Picts, didn’t wear sheeted armour and weren’t a highly organised and equipped army, that would have looked similar to the English on the battlefield.
I saw a history Professor rate Braveheart 1 out of 10 for historical accuracy recently. The 1 was because some of the named characters did actually exist and there was a war, nothing else.