Hart of the Matter
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Jul 2011
- Messages
- 5,180
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz again zzzzzzzzzz ..... oh wait.. paint drying..
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Kylian Mbappé | Real Madrid Player (pg620)
- Thread starter taleofbluehalves
- Start date
asahartford1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Nov 2016
- Messages
- 8,833
One thing is for certain, if Mbappe came, he would want to be off again in 2 years, He is being wagged by the tail.
Run away then, but think why this thread is currently activeYour concept relies on the player in question only wanting to come to City.
If Mbappe for example wanted out, he would be looking at all of the very biggest clubs, not just us.
That is a completely different concept to City having a pricing policy.
I can’t engage you any further. It’s a very simple idea. If you don’t get it, you don’t get it.
kaz7
Well-Known Member
No because we would have to sell a good player to fund it and be within spending rules and he seems to want to be on kev type money and that won't happen,the sooner people realise that the only player we would have done that for is Messi the better,pep has also said won't buy 100m players,why can't people grasp that we have a carefully balanced pay structure,pep has also said the squad harmony is why we don't go outside the pay structure,we keep our best players and add players who we see value in to improve the squad and not just one player who would cost more than we value him at and wanting big wages like sanchez etc,that is city and why we have the best in the business running usSorry so to be clear, you don't think we would spend 100m on Mbappe if he were available for that much?
doobyedoobye
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 4,861
He's going to leave PSG in the not to distant future and why wouldn't we be in the running to sign him?
He's going to leave PSG in the not to distant future and why wouldn't we be in the running to sign him?
No sense in talking about it in this transfer window if he isn't leaving in this transfer window.
I disagree with pretty much everything you just said, but fair enough. I've also seen zero evidence at all to suggest we would have to sell before buying to stay within spending limits.No because we would have to sell a good player to fund it and be within spending rules and he seems to want to be on kev type money and that won't happen,the sooner people realise that the only player we would have done that for is Messi the better,pep has also said won't buy 100m players,why can't people grasp that we have a carefully balanced pay structure,pep has also said the squad harmony is why we don't go outside the pay structure,we keep our best players and add players who we see value in to improve the squad and not just one player who would cost more than we value him at and wanting big wages like sanchez etc,that is city and why we have the best in the business running us
kaz7
Well-Known Member
SighI disagree with pretty much everything you just said, but fair enough. I've also seen zero evidence at all to suggest we would have to sell before buying to stay within spending limits.
Putting the pedantic semantics and extreme theoretical hypotheticals aside, does anyone really truly think this is likely to happen? Highly doubt it. Ultimately, the guy aint coming to City, while he is under contract at least.
Last edited:
So you just don't believe at all that we were in for him two years ago, despite him talking about it? Because that’s how much he would’ve cost then and we were prepared to spend it.Sigh