Lack of pace on the wings

Agreed. I also think the Club are making a decision on Laporte.

I do like Henry at Brentford. He always seems to have a decent game?

If we are not careful, we will get caught dozing at the wheel if Arsenal can add to their young mix and the likes of Chelsea going balls out on Nkuku and Fernandez?

Irony, the way we play, Rice would be more suited alongside Rodri than Bellingham?
rice is shit sorry. man literally hides from the ball. that last person to think of as a pep midfielder.
 
We’re currently second on foot of an extremely disjointed season and we happen to be up against an Arsenal side that has hit their straps early and are full of confidence but doom and gloom levels are off the charts.

Seems like a lot of supporters have short memories, Pep has constantly changed our team as other clubs have adapted to us. He has so far always managed to stay well ahead but there are far too many on here who seem to know better.

We lost to Brentford while our entire squad was looking at Qatar, we dropped points to Everton, playing poorly in miserable conditions. I see KDB is being moved towards the knackers yard for a poor game despite the fact he should have had 2 assists (Stones and Rodri).

Our team is in a bit of flux at the moment, we miss Dias leadership, Walker’s pace, we have few players in the departure lounge and so far haven’t mixed control with intensity but we’ve been champions 4 times in the last 5 seasons. We have the muscle memory of winners, we just need a little spark. Hopefully that comes on Thursday.
 
Would like to think so, but the media hype has died down since the World Cup ended.
In: Gvardiol - leao - Bellingham - Perrone
A left back (dont know) maybe Hernandez
Out: one maybe to centerbacks - Bernie:-(
Gundogan - let mahrez PLAY the cup games… move foden central - PLAY palmer
PLAY with alvarez too
 
I think Madrid as affected pep alot more than we think, hes constantly wanting/talking about transitions that's why he plays Grealish and Mahrez as wingers so we can control play. So he doesn't want to take those risks of a team breaking with their counter attack.
We have, and always will be susceptible to transitions and counters. It happened against Everton, no matter how we line up and how much we setup to keep the ball, its literally impossible to keep it for 100% of the time. The most annoying thing is that Everton were not built to counter us, he made changes to get some pace on so they could do just that. But if Pep had setup to use some width and even have and attacking fullbacks to overlap, more than likely we would have been a couple goals up at least. He wants control, which i understand, but surely its better to get the goals and then go for control to close the game out. The less we talk about Pep complaining of only being able to use 3 subs (even though he can use 5 now) and then not using fucking any of them till 85th minute, the better.
 
We’re currently second on foot of an extremely disjointed season and we happen to be up against an Arsenal side that has hit their straps early and are full of confidence but doom and gloom levels are off the charts.

Seems like a lot of supporters have short memories, Pep has constantly changed our team as other clubs have adapted to us. He has so far always managed to stay well ahead but there are far too many on here who seem to know better.

We lost to Brentford while our entire squad was looking at Qatar, we dropped points to Everton, playing poorly in miserable conditions. I see KDB is being moved towards the knackers yard for a poor game despite the fact he should have had 2 assists (Stones and Rodri).

Our team is in a bit of flux at the moment, we miss Dias leadership, Walker’s pace, we have few players in the departure lounge and so far haven’t mixed control with intensity but we’ve been champions 4 times in the last 5 seasons. We have the muscle memory of winners, we just need a little spark. Hopefully that comes on Thursday.
Very well said.

When you are as successful as we have been (and make no mistake, we have raised the bar in English football to stratospheric new heights), it is so easy to catastrophise everything that doesn't meet those high standards. We have been here before and come through similar challenges. We need good leadership but also to trust ourselves and what made us good in the first place. I think we'd all agree that we haven't been playing consistently well since probably Southampton at home, but some of our football prior to that was scintillating.

We have a few issues around the balance of the squad and the potential for big changes in the midfield in the coming year or so. Nevertheless, we have a magnificent scouting setup, an academy that is starting to bear fruit, and owners with unrelenting ambition to be the best.

Arsenal, to their credit, have been pulsating this season. They have a record of W14, D1, L1. Most seasons would see them top of the league with a record like that. If they win it, they deserve it. We can't, and won't, win it every year.

But remember this - we've chased and hunted before. When all has seemed lost, we've gone on ball-busting runs that have catapulted us to success. We can do it again. We can.
 
We started Mahrez Palmer Grealish and Alvarez and we had a fast and entertaining match vs Chelsea...

It is really not about the wingers.

We started Foden vs Brentford and it was bad as well.

As long as we start 3 CB at the back with 1 reverted fullback it really does not matter who is on the wing...
I'm not a fan of this inverted FB either. I personally think it's a needless gimmick. Pep is hell bent on doing this so get used to it. Call it whatever but it basically amounts to playing a FB in midfield in a 3-4-3 or a 3-2-2-3. If you're going to do that why not just play a real midfielder as the extra guy in the middle of the park? Teams have seen it and it doesn't seem to have troubled anyone with any great effect. It has kept us from keeping clean sheets, that I can say...
 
A reporter commenting on Arsenal's win at Brighton said "Arsenal, from the first whistle came out of the blocks like a house on fire" didn't we play like that once?
 
I have a really bad feeling that if both Bernardo and Gundogan go one of their replacements might be Maddison of Leicester. The way Pep talks about him is the same way he talked about Grealish when Grealish was at Villa.
I'd be happy with that. Maddison is the best available, has great vision, passing and dead-ball delivery.
Why would you not be happy with that; what gives you a bad feeling about him?
 
Grealish is perfect for the risk averse style we've adopted. Defences are happy for him to have as many touches as he likes as he very rarely threatens and his finishing is weak. It's a tough watch against a low block.
Agreed that's how it looks, but paying £100m for a player who receives the ball on the touch line, shields it a little and rolls it back to a full back.... bit strange all round - i never thought he had that much more in him. At Villa he ran a bit with it, but he hardly scored..or assisted, hey hardly scored..came in at an age when a £100m player should be a world beater - he isn't and wasn't..hardly got an international cao..£100m seems a really really strange buy...great agent though
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.