Lampard To City On Loan

Blue Haze said:
Blankomania said:
Blue Haze said:
Depends on the situation. I wouldn't throw one of our youngsters into, say, a situation like Real Madrid away. And if we have anything like the injury epidemic of last season, we might be thankful that we have a 36-year-old instead of a teenager.

For cup games we might decide to put youngsters in with Frank Lampard and rest our 1st teamers.

So in a hypothetical situation where we have loads of injuries and are playing real madrid before he leaves in january, he might get a game. I'm not saying we shouldn't sign him, i'm saying whats the big deal, he'd hardly get any games

Hopefully he won't get many games, because if he does it means several of our key players are injured. This loan only happened because he probably didn't want to play in Australia and NYCFC didn't want him sitting on the couch for six months.

Pellegrini has another option, that's all. He and Paddy V will know if a youth player is ready.

Yeah it all depends on who goes. If both rodwell and zuculini go out on loan. Then maybe he will get a lot of games.

I just like to see youth players get a chance thats all. Plus surely milner would be pissed if he is played in front of him.
 
We are competing on four fronts. This signing boosts our Capital One Cup campaign. They are all important.
 
Looks like this deal will go through.


SHIT! How weird will it be to see Lampard in a City shirt, does anyone have any Chelsea fans as mates? How do they feel?
The people I know are kinda upset
 
Tricky_Trev said:
We are competing on four fronts. This signing boosts our Capital One Cup campaign. They are all important.

It also boosts our CL campaign - not a bad option as the 5th HG player in a reduced squad.
 
Blankomania said:
Corky said:
Blankomania said:
So you would play him in front of any of the many other players who can do that job, so Milner who we want to stay but is complaining about game time or even giving a youngster a chance...

Milner wouldn't play central attacking midfield, and the 'youngster' you would put on for the game we need a goal would be?

We didn't put a left back on in the everton game to get a goal. We did it to shore up the defence.

Milner can play as an attacking midfielder. I would rather iheanacho came on to get a goal then lampard, if we're putting lampard on to get a goal we are in trouble.


Milner hasn't played the central attacking role, and also rarely scores. He offers something different to other players we have, obviously Yaya would be preferred to do that, but he gives us a decent option.
 
karen7 said:
Blankomania said:
Corky said:
Milner wouldn't play central attacking midfield, and the 'youngster' you would put on for the game we need a goal would be?

We didn't put a left back on in the everton game to get a goal. We did it to shore up the defence.

Milner can play as an attacking midfielder. I would rather iheanacho came on to get a goal then lampard, if we're putting lampard on to get a goal we are in trouble.

You would rather put a kid on to get a goal than someone who has scored the most at chelsea a few months ago?

So when do you give iheanacho a chance. Alright lad you will only play if we are 5 - 0 up and cruising.

It would be a chance for him to be a hero. Remember when richards scored that equalizer against villa, that was a massive boost for him.

Anyway if we are putting lampard on because we desperately need a goal with all the attacking players we have, something has terribly gone wrong.
 
nobody can eat fifty eggs said:
Not seen it anywhere but does this mean David Villa can sign for us on loan as well? Might need him...

He's already been loaned out, so no.
 
Corky said:
Blankomania said:
Corky said:
Milner wouldn't play central attacking midfield, and the 'youngster' you would put on for the game we need a goal would be?

We didn't put a left back on in the everton game to get a goal. We did it to shore up the defence.

Milner can play as an attacking midfielder. I would rather iheanacho came on to get a goal then lampard, if we're putting lampard on to get a goal we are in trouble.


Milner hasn't played the central attacking role, and also rarely scores. He offers something different to other players we have, obviously Yaya would be preferred to do that, but he gives us a decent option.

Lampards been playing the holding role for chelsea the last couple of years, he doesn't have the legs to play as a number 10 anymore.
 
nobody can eat fifty eggs said:
Not seen it anywhere but does this mean David Villa can sign for us on loan as well? Might need him...

No, he was loaned to Melbourne through December.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.