Whereas bringing on 17 year old would highlight how good everything must be..Blankomania said:karen7 said:Blankomania said:We didn't put a left back on in the everton game to get a goal. We did it to shore up the defence.
Milner can play as an attacking midfielder. I would rather iheanacho came on to get a goal then lampard, if we're putting lampard on to get a goal we are in trouble.
You would rather put a kid on to get a goal than someone who has scored the most at chelsea a few months ago?
So when do you give iheanacho a chance. Alright lad you will only play if we are 5 - 0 up and cruising.
It would be a chance for him to be a hero. Remember when richards scored that equalizer against villa, that was a massive boost for him.
Anyway if we are putting lampard on because we desperately need a goal with all the attacking players we have, something has terribly gone wrong.
Ok cheers.Peoria Blue said:nobody can eat fifty eggs said:Not seen it anywhere but does this mean David Villa can sign for us on loan as well? Might need him...
No, he was loaned to Melbourne through December.
Blankomania said:karen7 said:Blankomania said:So when do you give iheanacho a chance. Alright lad you will only play if we are 5 - 0 up and cruising.
It would be a chance for him to be a hero. Remember when richards scored that equalizer against villa, that was a massive boost for him.
Anyway if we are putting lampard on because we desperately need a goal with all the attacking players we have, something has terribly gone wrong.
Chucking on a youngster when you need a goal over a seasoned pro is mad whichever way you look at it
Not if the player your putting on is a striker while the the other has played as defensive midfielder for 2 years.
Blankomania said:karen7 said:Blankomania said:So when do you give iheanacho a chance. Alright lad you will only play if we are 5 - 0 up and cruising.
It would be a chance for him to be a hero. Remember when richards scored that equalizer against villa, that was a massive boost for him.
Anyway if we are putting lampard on because we desperately need a goal with all the attacking players we have, something has terribly gone wrong.
Chucking on a youngster when you need a goal over a seasoned pro is mad whichever way you look at it
Not if the player your putting on is a striker while the the other has played as defensive midfielder for 2 years.
How?Rammyblues said:Just enjoying the fact we have effectively stuck two fingers up to FFP and Platini as well.
Corky said:Keegan signed a 'past it' Bernarbia on a free, he didn't do too badly.
Blankomania said:Corky said:Keegan signed a 'past it' Bernarbia on a free, he didn't do too badly.
Yeah I always think of david silva as a poormans Huckerby
You say that, but without FFP we'd have made an offer Everton couldn't refuse and had Barkley instead.Rammyblues said:Just enjoying the fact we have effectively stuck two fingers up to FFP and Platini as well.
Rammyblues wrote:
Just enjoying the fact we have effectively stuck two fingers up to FFP and Platini as well.
How?
Like Lampard is a playing asset? It's just to keep him fit.