bluemanc said:Was that a deliberate touch of irony showing the Olympic the sister ship of the Titanic in the opening credits.
Evidence suggests that it was the Olympic that was hit by an iceberg & sunk & not the Titanic,Bob Ballard went on a secret mission for the American navy investigating the wrecks of the Scorpion & the Thresher & he was then allowed 12 days to find the Titanic.
A miracle happensd & he found it BUT it wasn't a miracle it had already been found & he was now ready after years of planning & prep of the site to reveal the long lost ship.
Skashion said:bluespana said:This was all covered on Mythbusters.
400,000 people were employed on the space program. Do you really think they were all in an Arizonian desert and hushed it up?
All Mythbusters proved is that some of the evidence used by conspiracy theorists is false and that there is anthropogenic equipment on the moon. The closest they came to proving that man landed on the moon was the video gravity bit because it is hard to simulate and/or reproduce low gravity. But it was hardly conclusive. Caribbean Hotels Proving something is possible is not the same as proving something happened. It's perfectly possible, in the laws of physics, for someone to fly a spacecraft to a speed very very close to c away from Earth for twenty or thirty years and then return younger than their children. Haven't seen any proof that it's happened.
I think that statement is flawed and that large numbers of people can be hushed up. For instance, why did Hitler not know that the D-Day landings were going to happen in Normandy and when it was going to happen? new york hotels Regardless, this assumes that NASA was entirely a hoax and they were not genuinely attempting to get to the moon and undertaking engineering efforts to do so. I've never seen any moan hoaxist make that claim - although there probably are a few. The most plausible hoaxists claim that not only was NASA trying to get to the moon but did have successful manned landings. However, they claim these landings were not the Apollo 11 landings and that at that point the U.S. was a few months/years away from being technically-capable of doing but due the political pressures NASA was under felt compelled to fake at least one. The likes of Mythbusters certainly never came anywhere near to disproving that.
JordanRHughes said:Skashion said:All Mythbusters proved is that some of the evidence used by conspiracy theorists is false and that there is anthropogenic equipment on the moon. The closest they came to proving that man landed on the moon was the video gravity bit because it is hard to simulate and/or reproduce low gravity. But it was hardly conclusive. Proving something is possible is not the same as proving something happened. It's perfectly possible, in the laws of physics, for someone to fly a spacecraft to a speed very very close to c away from Earth for twenty or thirty years and then return younger than their children. Haven't seen any proof that it's happened.
I think that statement is flawed and that large numbers of people can be hushed up. For instance, why did Hitler not know that the D-Day landings were going to happen in Normandy and when it was going to happen? Regardless, this assumes that NASA was entirely a hoax and they were not genuinely attempting to get to the moon and undertaking engineering efforts to do so. I've never seen any moan hoaxist make that claim - although there probably are a few. The most plausible hoaxists claim that not only was NASA trying to get to the moon but did have successful manned landings. However, they claim these landings were not the Apollo 11 landings and that at that point the U.S. was a few months/years away from being technically-capable of doing but due the political pressures NASA was under felt compelled to fake at least one. The likes of Mythbusters certainly never came anywhere near to disproving that.
Interesting. We didn't land on the moon. We can't even get out of the orbit, due to the radiation.
BlueMoonie said:Now i'm usually not into all this conspiracy shit, until I watched this I would have argued with anyone that we landed on the moon, now I am not so sure. I didn't realise the evidence against it, and the very last part of this video showing a clip from inside the rocket has put doubts into my mind.
Do you think we landed on the moon?
also watch the vid then give me your answer after too :P
<a class="postlink" href="http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/a-funny-thing-happened-on-the-way-to-the-moon/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/a-funny- ... -the-moon/</a>
BlueMoonie said:Now i'm usually not into all this conspiracy shit, until I watched this I would have argued with anyone that we landed on the moon, now I am not so sure. I didn't realise the evidence against it, and the very last part of this video showing a clip from inside the rocket has put doubts into my mind.
Do you think we landed on the moon?
also watch the vid then give me your answer after too :P
<a class="postlink" href="http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/a-funny-thing-happened-on-the-way-to-the-moon/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/a-funny- ... -the-moon/</a>
des hardi said:hey man they proved it on myth-busters...... and i didn t watch that sh*T for nothing,ya hear!