M
M
mat
Guest
Will the FA charge him retrospectivly or does that rule only apply when you twat a rag?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Larrson Tackle On Garcia (GIF)
- Thread starter jrb
- Start date
Chi-town blues
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 May 2012
- Messages
- 31,363
This^^^BigOscar said:Pellegrini didn't have a massive rant in the post match interview, so the media will probably just ignore it. Unfortunately that seems to be the way the disciplinary system works
How did the ref get away with it shows a bit character of a manager.
kippaxblue76
Well-Known Member
ifiwasarichfan said:I missed it in real time, but the replay showed that it was a really bad one.
Nothing wrong with Sunderland's Goal though, no matter how many replays you watch.
Watch again, its a clear foul.
B
B
blueinsa
Guest
Ref in not doing his fucking job correctly shocker!
We do seem to be on the end of some shit decisions more than most.....
We do seem to be on the end of some shit decisions more than most.....
PHOENIX9000
Active Member
- Joined
- 2 Feb 2013
- Messages
- 27
I said the first time I saw it in real time I knew it was a horrible challenge and the referee was in a perfect position to see the incident!!! How he couldn't see this or not give anything for the foul is beyond me!!! Would it of changed the match? Maybe? But City have got themselves to blame for the defeat so no excuses!!!! Plus the Milner incident leading to the goal was a clear foul but considering the foul earlier it doesn't surprise me that he wasn't going to give a foul for that one either!!!!!
Plaything of the gods
Well-Known Member
Exactly this. The banning rule should be changed to include the next n times his team plays ours, so even if he moves club he's barred from playing against us, say the next 2 games and the next 2 games against City.LoveCity said:tonea2003 said:Retrospective banning for sure
Problem with these is they do fook all to help us. I'm sure Stoke will be happy if he gets banned since they play Sunderland next................. when, of course, Sunderland's level will drop incredibly again and they'll be lucky to get a draw.
stunning idea!Plaything of the gods said:Exactly this. The banning rule should be changed to include the next n times his team plays ours, so even if he moves club he's barred from playing against us, say the next 2 games and the next 2 games against City.LoveCity said:tonea2003 said:Retrospective banning for sure
Problem with these is they do fook all to help us. I'm sure Stoke will be happy if he gets banned since they play Sunderland next................. when, of course, Sunderland's level will drop incredibly again and they'll be lucky to get a draw.
lust overlord
Well-Known Member
kevodevo said:stunning idea!Plaything of the gods said:Exactly this. The banning rule should be changed to include the next n times his team plays ours, so even if he moves club he's barred from playing against us, say the next 2 games and the next 2 games against City.LoveCity said:Problem with these is they do fook all to help us. I'm sure Stoke will be happy if he gets banned since they play Sunderland next................. when, of course, Sunderland's level will drop incredibly again and they'll be lucky to get a draw.
Yes it is .Especially if said player moves abroad,that'll help us no end......
I Hart Man City said:He's a ****. With shit hair too.
Yeah his hair is shit. It's very similar to Joe Hart's though, which is equally shit.
I mostly just watch football for the hair.