singing stand blue
Well-Known Member
Re: Last person post gets £20!!
^^^ Correct now i have it :D
^^^ Correct now i have it :D
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Last person post gets £20!!
- Thread starter Kippax.
- Start date
Grand Master Ram Rod
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Aug 2008
- Messages
- 6,376
Re: Last person post gets £20!!
Not no more. :)
Not no more. :)
singing stand blue
Well-Known Member
Re: Last person post gets £20!!
Excuse me ?
ellguitar said:KANT IS SO BORING
BORING PHILOSOPHY REVISION
FUCKING BORING.
Excuse me ?
Re: Last person post gets £20!!
Kant also disgards emotion. It seems vital to human that emotion is a part of our lives. We feel very strongly when someone is a generous or kind person over hard-hearted. However, Kants moral theory means that this is taken away. It would seem that being moral would lose all context in this ‘robotic’ theory. Kant seems to find emotion as an obsticle to genuine moral action, clouding judgment. Furthermore, when we want to do something and when we have a duty, for example a begger asking for money, it is sometimes unclear what has caused us to give the money. Yet if you did not wish to give the money but did so because of categorical imperitives your moral but is this equal to wanting to give it? Kants idea of a robotic morality seems less attractive and powerful as a human one currently.
Kant also disgards emotion. It seems vital to human that emotion is a part of our lives. We feel very strongly when someone is a generous or kind person over hard-hearted. However, Kants moral theory means that this is taken away. It would seem that being moral would lose all context in this ‘robotic’ theory. Kant seems to find emotion as an obsticle to genuine moral action, clouding judgment. Furthermore, when we want to do something and when we have a duty, for example a begger asking for money, it is sometimes unclear what has caused us to give the money. Yet if you did not wish to give the money but did so because of categorical imperitives your moral but is this equal to wanting to give it? Kants idea of a robotic morality seems less attractive and powerful as a human one currently.
Kippax.
Well-Known Member
Re: Last person post gets £20!!
ok then!
ellguitar said:Kant also disgards emotion. It seems vital to human that emotion is a part of our lives. We feel very strongly when someone is a generous or kind person over hard-hearted. However, Kants moral theory means that this is taken away. It would seem that being moral would lose all context in this ‘robotic’ theory. Kant seems to find emotion as an obsticle to genuine moral action, clouding judgment. Furthermore, when we want to do something and when we have a duty, for example a begger asking for money, it is sometimes unclear what has caused us to give the money. Yet if you did not wish to give the money but did so because of categorical imperitives your moral but is this equal to wanting to give it? Kants idea of a robotic morality seems less attractive and powerful as a human one currently.
ok then!
Grand Master Ram Rod
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Aug 2008
- Messages
- 6,376
Re: Last person post gets £20!!
It's a good tactic that, but not gooed enough. :)
It's a good tactic that, but not gooed enough. :)
tueartsboots
Well-Known Member
Re: Last person post gets £20!!
Very interesting. Mine by the way
Very interesting. Mine by the way
Grand Master Ram Rod
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Aug 2008
- Messages
- 6,376
Re: Last person post gets £20!!
Next person to post on this thread is a big raving gay rag!!
Next person to post on this thread is a big raving gay rag!!