stonerblue
Well-Known Member
themadinventor said:As usual the thread gets hijacked by idiots from all sides, the bottom line is this, he refused to do the job he's paid to do, which is no doubt against the terms of his employment, he got suspended now rescinded , the customers were compensated for inconvenience caused.
Any right thinking person can see the lads point but he took the law into his own hands so to speak and that just won't do, I mean where that can lead to is scarey, can a police officer refuse to arrest someone of the same belief/faith, can a fire fighter refuse to put out a fire at someone's house who is from a different political party.......answer No they can't , the rest is rhetoric and mud slinging.
he hasn't remotely 'taken the law into his own hands' as there is no law stating he must serve the bloke.
there is something very fishy about this story. I mean, when was the last time you went shopping with another bloke for clothes.
And what a lovely coincidence that the leader of a Muslim hating party happens to get served by someone with a name that could indicate he is Muslim?
Why is everyone calling the other bloke (do we know his name?) his 'mate' when he's probably robinsons protection.