blueparrot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 29,445
Another splitting hairs and missing the important point.I'd highly doubt it was for racism ?
Another splitting hairs and missing the important point.I'd highly doubt it was for racism ?
Tories are in today , no other reason to side with anderson of all people , lolAnother splitting hairs and missing the important point.
Just wow.Another splitting hairs and missing the important point.
Who is siding with Anderson, he's probably getting less than he deserves ?Tories are in today , no other reason to side with anderson of all people , lol
How is it racist?Yeah, better not said , it was racist and lies hence the whip being withdrawn
Plenty of right-wing sources have pretty good search engine optimization. The Daily Mail are regularly at the top of Google search results. Yet somehow all of those Daily Mail stories about left-wing terrorists are being lost. Interesting.Shock, google is biased. In other news, the water is wet.
There is plenty of extremism both on the left and right. Burning/destroying public property or, worse, hurting people in the name of some perceived social justice = extremism. Simple as.
Of course I can, I changed my post to religious bigotry but for some reason you can't let it go and discuss the original point that Anderson,Braverman and Jenrick not to mention Truss are more dangerous. You'd rather keep diverting to the same point,going on about the difference.Do you think they are right ?Just wow.
You talk about missing the point whilst you can't tell the difference between race and religion ?
We can just put it down mostly to contrary politics, some people don't grow out of their teenage angst or rage until they are asked to pay some of their own money to society.
As it was you who is stating it is racist, I am interested in how you come to that conclusion. If it is obvious, then enlighten me.Well he's had the whip taken off him now so ask Sunak.Seems pretty obvious to me.