1. Mangala doesn't have the pace to match Vardy. He is fast, but Vardy is faster and less rigid.
2. Playing Mangala's probably results in a 5-10 drop in possession %. So rather than a 65 to 70% possession, you at 55 to 65%. That drop in itself results in 2 to 3 more chances been created.
Part of this is Mangala's ability and part of it is the lack of confidence of not having been doing this in real game situation like the rest.
3. If Mangala played, any smart manager should press us but funnel the ball to Mangala. Make him the playmaker out of the back. You can expect that.
Otamendi was our best passer out of the back early in the season partly coz teams purposely let the ball funnel to him... Apparently a lot of managers like fans and pundits erroneously concluded Ota was the passing weak link until he made them pay consistently.
Can Mangala do the same? And is the notion he is a weak passer out of the back erroneous? These might be questions worth examining
Or not :)
Agreed, all of that. We played 2 games so far this season with Mangala iirc, both in EFL cup (Brom and Wolves)
From my knowledge, Mangala wasn't half bad in the Brom game really, and I think he made our first goal with an incisive pass to Raheem passing through the lines. I know it isn't ideal but the only other options we have is to play Tosin at LCB or play Danilo or Dinho/Walker out of position.