We were outplayed comprehensively and beaten conclusively. Firstly, I think we should show a little humility and say that Leicester are a very good team and were too good for us, on the day at least. Our performance was depressingly reminiscent of those we had served up at home to Liverpool and away at Stoke.
I don't accept any of the nonsense that Ya Ya is lazy or that other players lack the "winning mentality". I think some of it has to do with injuries: Vinnie's leadership is sorely missed and with David clearly not fit our other creative players cannot be considered for selection. We don't have a back four so much as four players who try to play in defence together when they are the four fit at the same time.
I feel that much of is down to our approach. Our full backs have to attack and then get back but our possession game simply isn't good enough these days so Our backs get stranded right up field and can't get back because Zaba is just back from a nasty knee injury and Kolorov lacks pace. Ya Ya needs 5 or 6 paces to get up to full speed, which means, when running back to defend, you are effectively out of the game. But we persist with a two man midfield. This means that Ferna, MdM and Otamendi are left to deal with a side advancing at pace and in numbers. Peller's philosophy appears to be to win the ball back quickly and counter. This seems to result in the repeated rash, missed tackles which led to the second Leicester goal.
My instinct is to abandon the high line, defend deeper and not to take so many risks. This is, as they would say now, "pragmatic". Unfortunately, I have to admit that two of Leicester's goals came from set pieces, against which our players were all in position, but Huth was largely unopposed when he scored. Our defending deep and in numbers was more disastrous and costly than our high line. Something needs doing, but I don't know what.