Leonardo Bonucci

Status
Not open for further replies.
You can sugarcoat it all you like but I think 60million quid is obscene to pay for any player let alone a 29 year old defender. He's a fantastic player don't get me wrong but not for that price
 
If true, game over.....close thread!;)

Arjun Pradeep ‏@IndianRegista 2m2 minutes ago
#Mediaset: #Bonucci is set to renew his contract with #Juve for €4.5m + bonuses... Sí

Cm7KohsWgAA9K7p.jpg

3 retweets2 likes
 
Juve wouldn't want to lose Pogba and Bonucci in one window. They'd look like a smaller club.

So...with Pogba wanting out, we agree to show our interest in Bonucci so that when he stays at Juve, the Juve fans are less unhappy about losing Pogba.

Pogba goes to Real and we get Kroos.

City, Real, Juve all happy.
 
Juve wouldn't want to lose Pogba and Bonucci in one window. They'd look like a smaller club.

So...with Pogba wanting out, we agree to show our interest in Bonucci so that when he stays at Juve, the Juve fans are less unhappy about losing Pogba.

Pogba goes to Real and we get Kroos.

City, Real, Juve all happy.


really like your thinking and really hope your right
 
It seems players are alot more reluctant to push through a move this window. To miss out on Bonucci, Laporte and potentially Sane would be terrible.
 
You can sugarcoat it all you like but I think 60million quid is obscene to pay for any player let alone a 29 year old defender. He's a fantastic player don't get me wrong but not for that price
If he's a fantastic player who will improve us in an area we've struggled with for 2/3 years I'm not sure where this sugarcoating comes from?
Fans who would rather us have a healthy bank balance as opposed to a healthy trophy cabinet are getting their priorities all wrong.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.