lescott - part of the Jo agreement

1qwerty said:
just as a matter of interest , if Jo is such a bad player ...... why spend £19m on him ? was it bad judgement or just because MH never signed him he was not prepared to persevere with him ?

We haven't spent £19m on him, £4m up front the rest are clauses. The only reason we publicised £19million is because there were strong rumours of us being in the shit financially and Thaskin wanted a bit of good PR. 'Look we can still pay a club record fee'
 
I dont mind city acctually, theres alot of clubs i dislike more.
The only thing is since investment theres alot of dellusion.

But I suppose every club is like that after major investment.
 
eeverton11cn6.jpg
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.