Does that mean we are looking to tie up a deal to replace him by the 20th?waspish said:Carver said:waspish said:Reports say he has agreed a deal of 90k for the rest of the season then a 31/2 year deal on 70k a week if west Ham stay up
The report says that the deal has been done with City, not Lescott mate, which was my point.
Here's the original link in post no. 1.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/west-ham/10566423/West-Ham-agree-deal-with-Manchester-City-to-take-Joleon-Lescott-for-90000-a-week.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/footba ... -week.html</a>
Yeah I read it, the only deal they can do with us is if we agree to let him go at all in this January window and "if" you believe the media we won't let him go till the 20th
NoBurtonblue said:Does that mean we are looking to tie up a deal to replace him by the 20th?waspish said:Carver said:The report says that the deal has been done with City, not Lescott mate, which was my point.
Here's the original link in post no. 1.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/west-ham/10566423/West-Ham-agree-deal-with-Manchester-City-to-take-Joleon-Lescott-for-90000-a-week.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/footba ... -week.html</a>
Yeah I read it, the only deal they can do with us is if we agree to let him go at all in this January window and "if" you believe the media we won't let him go till the 20th
Then the story must be bullshit.Big Dave Watson said:NoBurtonblue said:Does that mean we are looking to tie up a deal to replace him by the 20th?waspish said:Yeah I read it, the only deal they can do with us is if we agree to let him go at all in this January window and "if" you believe the media we won't let him go till the 20th
Burtonblue said:Then the story must be bullshit.Big Dave Watson said:NoBurtonblue said:Does that mean we are looking to tie up a deal to replace him by the 20th?
Cannot see us letting him go without cover in CD.
Burtonblue said:Then the story must be bullshit.Big Dave Watson said:NoBurtonblue said:Does that mean we are looking to tie up a deal to replace him by the 20th?
Cannot see us letting him go without cover in CD.
El Mago said:Burtonblue said:Then the story must be bullshit.Big Dave Watson said:
Cannot see us letting him go without cover in CD.
We already have 3 CD with ( Kompany, Nastasic & Demi) with also Richards and Garcia to cover there when needed.
bobmcfc said:I can't imagine how daft it would be to let him go in january. I just don't see how it benefits us at all when we are short of cover ? Even if we got someone in they would still need to adapt. Lescott slots right in, knows the team, the tactics and is comfortable here. We don't need the interruptions when we are going for the title
He stays here
Richards can't be relied on to not get injured, vinny can get injured too, nastasic has been injured and is young
Garcia ? I shall refrain from bringing up his lack of defensive qualities
Zin 'messiah' Zimmer said:bobmcfc said:I can't imagine how daft it would be to let him go in january. I just don't see how it benefits us at all when we are short of cover ? Even if we got someone in they would still need to adapt. Lescott slots right in, knows the team, the tactics and is comfortable here. We don't need the interruptions when we are going for the title
He stays here
Richards can't be relied on to not get injured, vinny can get injured too, nastasic has been injured and is young
Garcia ? I shall refrain from bringing up his lack of defensive qualities
Get back putting the Sunday lunch on wench!