Well, we have a new manager who makes very different demands on the players than Pellegrini and who seemed to be coaching endlessly from the touchline last Saturday and on Tueseday because the players were not playing as he demanded: then we have David who missed the final chunk of last season, played in the euros and arrived back late. He seems to need games rather than a rest. Then there's Sterling whose confidence is surging back after a poor end to last season and persecution after the euros. What purpose would resting him serve? Fernandinho wants to play not rest and we need him at least until Illy can play regularly. The backbone of our team need to play together to play the way the manager demands, something they won't learn on the bench or in the stands. Otamendi is apparently fit now - it isn't usual to leave a player out because he's no longer injured! Nor would it be sensible to give Angelino minutes in a system the more established players have not yet come to terms with.
I have to admit that i find the obsession some of our fans have with "rotation" and "throwing on the kids" is quite ridiculous. I can only assume that it fills some deep psychological need to please rags and/or the Daily Mail.
I get your point, but I disagree, and here are a few points for my reasoning:
1) We run the risk of injuries, which is unnecessary in a dead rubber. (Negredo against West Ham and also Kompany + Ottamendi getting injured in the second leg of our CL game with Kiev last year).
2) Players DO need a rest, the games will come thick and fast now, after a summer of international competition we always see tired legs in the second half of the season - this will be one less game for players like Aguero, Silva and KDB who're going to be playing 45+ games hopefully.
3) Our best players can focus on the games against Stoke and West Ham, which are undeniably going to have more at stake.
4) It keeps our 'squad' motivated because they're getting a bit more game time, keeps the squad happy which makes Pep's life easier moving forward.
5) Gives us a chance to see other players in a new system, some might shock us and force their way into the first team.
6) Keeps squad players match fit in case we get injuries over the next few weeks and they have to come in as cover.
7) Good chance for squad players to learn the new system, with less pressure.
8) We could offer Champions League debuts to some younger lads, so if they're ever called upon in a bigger, higher pressure game they might be slightly more accustomed to it, and as a result more likely to perform well.
9) The fans would appreciate seeing 2/3 LOCAL lads on the pitch for the first time in years. (who that would be I don't know, but Tosin could easily come into the team, someone like Aaron Nemane or Jacob Davenport are good enough for this match).
10) It would offer key youth players, who might not see their future with City (because Mancini and Pellegrini were reluctant to offer any first team chances), a glimpse of hope that we do actually care about bringing young players through. That will help us bring in better youth players moving forward (the likes of Brahim would be more willing to come and develop with us).
It will be hard though because someone like Aguero will be dying to play in this game, he'd be assured to add a few goals to his tally, and if he's getting paid £10/20,000 per goal it could be worth a small fortune to him!
I'd go for this team (baring any injuries against Stoke).
Hart
Stones Tosin
Zabaleta (C) Davenport Delph
Sane Nasri Yaya Nemane
Iheanacho
Subs: Willy, Ottamendi, Kolarov, Fernando, KDB, Silva, Aguero