Levelling Up - more than a slogan or another Con con?

Has anybody got anything good to say about this or even believe that the poorest regions will actually get decent funding?
The intention is good and that would normally earn it universal acclaim, but it would take substantial money for many decades to achieve. It could and probably should come from within and from everyone if the idea is to truly unite the country. But how many are prepared to pay 5% extra in taxes each month for the foreseeable to make that happen? Indeed. Instead, the Government is looking to rely on external and private investment, which makes one wonder what they will be offered in return.
 
Has anybody got anything good to say about this or even believe that the poorest regions will actually get decent funding?
Order. Order. Any more hilarity and the thread gets pulled.
There's more chance of the Net releasing an unredacted Gray report...Nil.
The "plan" took over 20 minutes of cross-checking marginal tory seats, as they, and only they, will get a penny. If any cash went anywhere else johnson would be flirted quick-time by the ultras in the cabinet, aided and abetted by the msm.
 
The intention is good and that would normally earn it universal acclaim, but it would take substantial money for many decades to achieve. It could and probably should come from within and from everyone if the idea is to truly unite the country. But how many are prepared to pay 5% extra in taxes each month for the foreseeable to make that happen? Indeed. Instead, the Government is looking to rely on external and private investment, which makes one wonder what they will be offered in return.
I’m prepared to offer the extra on my wage but are the well off on theirs? From what I see, what they are proposing they just can’t deliver because they know there’s not the buy in, which is shown by the lack of in-depth strategy within the White Paper.

There‘s no good intention here, the only intention is to move the talk on by promising change in 30 years.
 
I’m prepared to offer the extra on my wage but are the well off on theirs? From what I see, what they are proposing they just can’t deliver because they know there’s not the buy in, which is shown by the lack of in-depth strategy within the White Paper.

There‘s no good intention here, the only intention is to move the talk on by promising change in 30 years.
They just don't have the money. As I posted earlier in this thread, the idea is to achieve the kind of productivity levels that Germany has managed since reunification, yet that has taken almost 30 years of everyone paying an extra 5% per month. England in that time has instead championed itself as a comparatively low-tax country, but that has led to enormous underinvestment and ever-widening disparities. Look at the furor that proposed increases on NI and fuel bills are creating; there just isn't the culture to accept tax hikes even if they were universal.

I think deep down the intention is good, and I'm sure all politicians, no matter their hue, would agree that it should be done. How it is done, alas, is where any agreement starts to unravel.
 
They did, which meant it was very difficult to bid for EU regeneration funding, which was match funded, meaning if a region was successful in winning EU funds, in order to draw it down the money needed to be match funded 50/50 by central government.

Of course central government didn't want to cough up. Quick fix, get rid of the agencies that bid, hence no bid, hence no money, hence no obligation to match fund.

Our poorest regions lost untold millions in regeneration funding as a consequence.
There were all sorts of small pots as well, e.g. Coalfields Regeneration; small schemes that made a difference, funnelled mostly to the more deprived areas.
 
They just don't have the money. As I posted earlier in this thread, the idea is to achieve the kind of productivity levels that Germany has managed since reunification, yet that has taken almost 30 years of everyone paying an extra 5% per month. England in that time has instead championed itself as a comparatively low-tax country, but that has led to enormous underinvestment and ever-widening disparities. Look at the furor that proposed increases on NI and fuel bills are creating; there just isn't the culture to accept tax hikes even if they were universal.

I think deep down the intention is good, and I'm sure all politicians, no matter their hue, would agree that it should be done. How it is done, alas, is where any agreement starts to unravel.
And that’s why it’s just a fairy tale from the current incumbents, used as a way to move the narrative on, as the timing shows.

So, in reality, and if you are prepared to use it in this way then it has no substance at all so negates the ‘good intentions’ that you suggest.

Looking at the furore over taxes and energy prices, you seem to put it down to a cultural issue when it’s far more than that. The only cultural thing that can be said is that those who are doing well can call it ‘Cultural’ whereas those, and there are many, cannot see it any other way other than ‘Surviving’.

I’m unsure if you are playing Devils Advocate or trying to reason to people as a Johnson supporter, either way, you are well worded but seem very much on the governments side. Which, I have no problems with, that’s why we have a forum for debate, but it would be nice not to hide the hand.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.