How do people know what these nonces are after? Is it a known fact it's power and fear?
No, there's no evidence to suggest it's an attraction based solely on power and fear. Some of them like NAMBLA and PIE seem to think that it's society that's messed up rather than them which would suggest that there's a stroke of normality to it in their heads. Or rather they see it's not accepted by society but believe it should be, meaning that it's not an aggressive power fantasy. Aggressive power and fear fantasies whole point is to work outside the lines of acceptability, the fact that these people are trying to convince it's acceptable rules that out.
As I said earlier, from everything I've read about it it seems to be a sexual compulsion formed early on in development and effectively hidden throughout late puberty and adulthood. There was some research that suggests it's a "cross wiring" in the brain whereby instead of seeing a child and hitting a nurturing instinct, they fire a sexual instinct. The important bit here is that being short and left handed are both hugely over represented in the paedophile population and both of those are decided in the first trimester of development which logically could suggest that this is determined in the same way. Maternal stress in the first trimester has been pinpointed as a possible cause, as has usage of psychedelic drugs in early pregnancy.
Interestingly (wrong word but you know what I mean), there are heterosexual and homosexual paedophiles. It seems to run across normal sexual gender lines which would also suggest it's something of a brain problem rather than a development problem.
And therein lies the problem though, we don't know if all of that is accurate or bollocks. People who study it say it seems to make sense but there's a round agreement that nobody really understands paedophilia because there's no safe way for a paedophile to out themselves without losing every single job, friend, family member they have and putting their relatives through the hell of the backlash from those group one dickheads.
This is my irritation with the hang 'em high lot. We don't know how to solve paedophilia as an issue in society, we all accept that. Their version forces paedophiles to be less forthcoming, to point them towards the criminal groups rather than allowing them to come forward and participate in studies that can help people understand it and actually stop or at least prevent it from occurring in the first place. The hang 'em high lot are unknowingly making the world a much more dangerous place for children and they're ok with that as long as they get to have the fun of somebody they don't like dying.
Fully agree, didn't channel 4 do a documentary on young teens seeking help for being attracted to children. Everyones reaction straight away is to kill or beat them. Doesn't solve anything does it?
No, there's no evidence to suggest it's an attraction based solely on power and fear. Some of them like NAMBLA and PIE seem to think that it's society that's messed up rather than them which would suggest that there's a stroke of normality to it in their heads. Or rather they see it's not accepted by society but believe it should be, meaning that it's not an aggressive power fantasy. Aggressive power and fear fantasies whole point is to work outside the lines of acceptability, the fact that these people are trying to convince it's acceptable rules that out.
As I said earlier, from everything I've read about it it seems to be a sexual compulsion formed early on in development and effectively hidden throughout late puberty and adulthood. There was some research that suggests it's a "cross wiring" in the brain whereby instead of seeing a child and hitting a nurturing instinct, they fire a sexual instinct. The important bit here is that being short and left handed are both hugely over represented in the paedophile population and both of those are decided in the first trimester of development which logically could suggest that this is determined in the same way. Maternal stress in the first trimester has been pinpointed as a possible cause, as has usage of psychedelic drugs in early pregnancy.
Interestingly (wrong word but you know what I mean), there are heterosexual and homosexual paedophiles. It seems to run across normal sexual gender lines which would also suggest it's something of a brain problem rather than a development problem.
And therein lies the problem though, we don't know if all of that is accurate or bollocks. People who study it say it seems to make sense but there's a round agreement that nobody really understands paedophilia because there's no safe way for a paedophile to out themselves without losing every single job, friend, family member they have and putting their relatives through the hell of the backlash from those group one dickheads.
This is my irritation with the hang 'em high lot. We don't know how to solve paedophilia as an issue in society, we all accept that. Their version forces paedophiles to be less forthcoming, to point them towards the criminal groups rather than allowing them to come forward and participate in studies that can help people understand it and actually stop or at least prevent it from occurring in the first place. The hang 'em high lot are unknowingly making the world a much more dangerous place for children and they're ok with that as long as they get to have the fun of somebody they don't like dying.
What if, as I very much suspect would be the case, it's shown to make no difference either way?So for me this is a no, unless somehow it could be proved it would reduce crimes against kids in which case I would change my mind faced my proof.
It's certainly true that there are people who abuse kids who aren't paedophiles, and in those cases, it probably is power-based. But the vast majority of child abuse is carried out by paedophiles (which can be tested for by looking at brain activity).The one other glaring assumption I would challenge here is it assumes the crime is sex driven and not power driven , this would have no effect on a paedophile wanting to wield power over children and therefore would have no impact on many cases
Why is it outrageous? Do people not have the rights to choose to be gay? Or would we prefer to class it as a disease or a mental problem?
My cousin is gay but he use to like girls up until the age of 17/18, no one pressured him into hiding it and he never did, so surely you'd class that as choosing to be gay? Elton John, once married to a woman, now gay.
To me that's a choice.
Roy whiting is a murderer and a nonce I wish him dead am I a bad man?Rape and murder are totally different crimes from child sexual abuse in terms of how or why they happen. Child abuse isn't usually a crime of passion, it's a crime of compulsion. The people who are compulsive rapists or murders are already accepted to be criminally insane and treated for it. Comparing the two is like comparing nicking a bar of chocolate to staging the Great Train Robbery because they both happen to involve stealing something.
If somebody is not trying to understand an issue and its causes then their opinion on that issue is quite worthless.
This is a problem. It's not going to go away with the draconian methods that have been tried for a long time in many different countries with no success at all. Either you want children to be raped or you don't, and this self satisfying idea that we should execute them to make you feel better despite the massively increased risk to children is disgusting.
Roy whiting is a murderer and a nonce I wish him dead am I a bad man?