OB1
Well-Known Member
BillyShears said:Prestwich_Blue said:There is simply no way we will be close to breaking even in the forthcoming accounts. The only question is whether the loss will be low enough for us to squeeze through the first licencing period. But the advantage of Messi as opposed to buying a group of players such as Luke Shaw, Pogba, Ramos, etc is that he wil bring additional revenue that they simply won't.
I'm not absolutely sure on this but I suspect that we have an agreement with Nike & Etihad that they will pay us more if he comes. That could involve another £15-20m from them alone. And don't forget the BT Sport TV deal has kicked in, which gives us over £30m a year more without lifting a finger. And there's all the other commercial deals that would follow him. Do 4 or 5 of those at £5m a pop and that's his gross wages paid.
It's simply not conceivable that City would sign Messi and then UEFA would ban City from their preeminent tournament for failing to pass FFPR.
IMO there's way too much over analysis of how a transfer like this would effect FFPR. Frankly I'm sure that there would be a compelling case, even if the figures did end up the wrong side of FFPR, for the transfer to be treated as a special case. He's arguably the greatest player ever and it'd be tantamount to serious restraint of trade if no club could be allowed to pay his market value due to UEFA regulations.
This will come down solely to what Messi wants. If he wants to stay at Barca he will. If he wants out, he'll be a City player.
If he were to come to City - and I think there is a compelling case for it should he choose to leave Barca - I would have thought that, from a financial point of view, part of the incentive will be a number of new sponsorship deals for him from Abu Dhabi based businesses.