Hihosilva said:100 pages by 1pm come on!!!
blue b4 the moon said:Hihosilva said:100 pages by 1pm come on!!!
Will that mean he's coming?
blue b4 the moon said:Hihosilva said:100 pages by 1pm come on!!!
Will that mean he's coming?
silvasleftleg said:Would be a great signing if the fee was in installments or with the help of sponsors or something.
Instalments wouldn't make any difference but I believe there would be uplifts from existing deals. We could possibly do it without but a large part of the rationale for this deal is significantly increased commercial income.Damocles said:Without any uplifts from currently existing sponsorship deals, do you think we could do it financially PB?
JoeMercer'sWay said:Prestwich_Blue said:There is simply no way we will be close to breaking even in the forthcoming accounts. The only question is whether the loss will be low enough for us to squeeze through the first licencing period. But the advantage of Messi as opposed to buying a group of players such as Luke Shaw, Pogba, Ramos, etc is that he wil bring additional revenue that they simply won't.
I'm not absolutely sure on this but I suspect that we have an agreement with Nike & Etihad that they will pay us more if he comes. That could involve another £15-20m from them alone. And don't forget the BT Sport TV deal has kicked in, which gives us over £30m a year more without lifting a finger. And there's all the other commercial deals that would follow him. Do 4 or 5 of those at £5m a pop and that's his gross wages paid.
yeah we may struggle on the accounts we're about to publish, but next year I envisage a huge jump that will set us way on the road to a long term immensely profitable future, I can't wait for 12 months time.
Depends how you define "get back" DD.Didsbury Dave said:JoeMercer'sWay said:Prestwich_Blue said:There is simply no way we will be close to breaking even in the forthcoming accounts. The only question is whether the loss will be low enough for us to squeeze through the first licencing period. But the advantage of Messi as opposed to buying a group of players such as Luke Shaw, Pogba, Ramos, etc is that he wil bring additional revenue that they simply won't.
I'm not absolutely sure on this but I suspect that we have an agreement with Nike & Etihad that they will pay us more if he comes. That could involve another £15-20m from them alone. And don't forget the BT Sport TV deal has kicked in, which gives us over £30m a year more without lifting a finger. And there's all the other commercial deals that would follow him. Do 4 or 5 of those at £5m a pop and that's his gross wages paid.
yeah we may struggle on the accounts we're about to publish, but next year I envisage a huge jump that will set us way on the road to a long term immensely profitable future, I can't wait for 12 months time.
I can't see us being "immensely profitable" for a long long time, if ever. Our accounts are already fudged with friendly sponsorship deals so what you see is not what you get either.
We are a business running at an enormous loss. I would imagine the intention is purely to get the club to break-even, so it costs ADUG nothing more. But by the time that happens make no bones, The Sheikh will have invested well over a billion pounds, money he will never get back. Money he hopefully sees as well spent of course.
gordondaviesmoustache said:Depends how you define "get back" DD.Didsbury Dave said:JoeMercer'sWay said:yeah we may struggle on the accounts we're about to publish, but next year I envisage a huge jump that will set us way on the road to a long term immensely profitable future, I can't wait for 12 months time.
I can't see us being "immensely profitable" for a long long time, if ever. Our accounts are already fudged with friendly sponsorship deals so what you see is not what you get either.
We are a business running at an enormous loss. I would imagine the intention is purely to get the club to break-even, so it costs ADUG nothing more. But by the time that happens make no bones, The Sheikh will have invested well over a billion pounds, money he will never get back. Money he hopefully sees as well spent of course.
Didsbury Dave said:JoeMercer'sWay said:Prestwich_Blue said:There is simply no way we will be close to breaking even in the forthcoming accounts. The only question is whether the loss will be low enough for us to squeeze through the first licencing period. But the advantage of Messi as opposed to buying a group of players such as Luke Shaw, Pogba, Ramos, etc is that he wil bring additional revenue that they simply won't.
I'm not absolutely sure on this but I suspect that we have an agreement with Nike & Etihad that they will pay us more if he comes. That could involve another £15-20m from them alone. And don't forget the BT Sport TV deal has kicked in, which gives us over £30m a year more without lifting a finger. And there's all the other commercial deals that would follow him. Do 4 or 5 of those at £5m a pop and that's his gross wages paid.
yeah we may struggle on the accounts we're about to publish, but next year I envisage a huge jump that will set us way on the road to a long term immensely profitable future, I can't wait for 12 months time.
I can't see us being "immensely profitable" for a long long time, if ever. Our accounts are already fudged with friendly sponsorship deals so what you see is not what you get either.
We are a business running at an enormous loss. I would imagine the intention is purely to get the club to break-even, so it costs ADUG nothing more. But by the time that happens make no bones, The Sheikh will have invested well over a billion pounds, money he will never get back. Money he hopefully sees as well spent of course.