OB1
Well-Known Member
Prestwich_Blue said:Why do people only measure these things in shirt sales? There are commercial organisations who would pay handsomely to have their name associated with Messi and ADUG have done their homework on this deal. Rooney's reported £300k a week doesn't come out of the rags' pockets but probably half of it comes from third parties. And that's for a fat, foul-mouthed, granny-shagging, fag-smoking Scouse tosser, let alone the hottest property in world football.inbetween said:Prestwich_Blue said:That article is horrible, utterly horrible. Guy is supposed to be a football finance expert yet doesn't seem to know the difference between structuring payments and amortisation. Also no discussion of the potential revenue boost from signing someone like Messi. Let's hope he's been horribly misquoted as that level of stupidity from someone who's regularly quoted in the media is inexcusable.
I think though the Messi effect is still overstated. We are saying that Messi will repay his transfer himself in revenue but this is near on impossible over the length of his contract.
The cash itself is not an issue for us, plus our revenue will take another significant jump from next year, with the opening of the new stand, the new Campus & Etihad sponsorship deals and the kicking in of the BT CL deal. We should be showing an FFP surplus of around £70m (€90m) each year from 2015/16 onwards, against an allowed €10m loss. That gives us an extra £75m a year to play with, regardless of anything else we bring in, before we need to think about FFP.
I don't believe that this deal, should it happen, will just be about what City can afford. If Mansour wants Messi at City - and it is hard to imagine that he does not - he can surely arrange for additional sponsorship deals for Messi that are tied to him being a City player so that Messi can increase his earnings by joining City without - quite legitimately - all the extra remuneration going through City's books e.g. Etihad ambassador...
The benefits to City - and Abu Dhabi - of signing Messi would go well beyond any immediate increase in revenue to City from the association. Having Messi at City would change how other potential transfer targets view City, for instance. Signing Messi could speed up City's attempts to win the Champions League; which in of itself would have short and long term benefits to City. Buying Messi could be a long term investment that extends well beyond any time he spends at MCFC.
If Messi leaves Barca, City have to make sure he comes to us.