YaYa's Left Peg
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 1,478
What annoys me is phrases like 'we should be beating so and so' - based on what?
If you qualify it with 'given the amount we've spent, we ought to be beating Sunderland' - then fair enough, there's logical rationale to it, but without qualifying it, it comes across as a 'we should be beating them because that's the natural order of things' - and that's arrogance.
To be fair many City fans come out with this crap too - I've heard it many times, and I've probably done it myself if I'm honest - made the 'assumption' that City should beat Oldham - just because.
Wolves were once a great team, now they aren't. Things change. Liverpool were once a poor then, then a great team, then just a good team.
30 years from now, we might be bankrupt, Liverpool might be a conference side, and Kettering are European Champions. There's no divine right to a damn thing.
I'd rather phrase it as 'we ought to be beating Sunderland because we have better players than them'. Your apparent insistence that everything has to be qualified by the money word is frankly boring, as you or somebody has already pointed out, money doesn't necessarily guarantee success - if it did the rags would win it every year.
And I don't think I have seen anyone on here say we have a divine right to win the PL or CL or anything for that matter.