Liverpool (A) Post Match Thread.

50/50 for me but 100% agree in Stones misreading the play.

He had a split second where he could have cleared the ball but appeared to get caught in two minds. I think he thought he could pass it back to Ederson but then the ball seemed to pick up pace then he was pushed in the back. It was a foul all day long as it knocked him off balance I can't believe people saying it wasn't. Stones form is a bit worrying. Three games, three mistakes, three goals conceded.
 
He had a split second where he could have cleared the ball but appeared to get caught in two minds. I think he thought he could pass it back to Ederson but then the ball seemed to pick up pace then he was pushed in the back. It was a foul all day long as it knocked him off balance I can't believe people saying it wasn't. Stones form is a bit worrying. Three games, three mistakes, three goals conceded.

Like last season. Virtually every mistake he made led to a goal. He has looked extremely ropey since coming back
 
Like last season. Virtually every mistake he made led to a goal. He has looked extremely ropey since coming back

Hire can it be his mistake if
He had a split second where he could have cleared the ball but appeared to get caught in two minds. I think he thought he could pass it back to Ederson but then the ball seemed to pick up pace then he was pushed in the back. It was a foul all day long as it knocked him off balance I can't believe people saying it wasn't. Stones form is a bit worrying. Three games, three mistakes, three goals conceded.

How was it his mistake if you accept it was a foul?
 
Sorry for picking your's out, but no one is flapping? There's some comments on what was a very bizarre game,and folk trying to make sense of it,but no flapping. No one is panicking, no one is saying it's going tits up,no one saying it's going wrong, just some people trying to make sense. Hateful to lose against them that's the issue, annoyance more than flapping.
It was actually a play on his words, I chose piss flapping for other reasons.
 
Speaking to a Liverpool fan at work today and after giving him the glare when asked "did you see the game ?" the conversation moved on about the main talking points of yesterday in a calm and level manner. I then asked him about the behaviour of the Liverpool fans towards Raheem Sterling and "why are they so bitter after 3 years considering Van Dyck, Lallana and Mane all did the same to force moves from their old club to move to Liverpool?" His reply was that Liverpool fans aren't bitter towards Sterling leaving them for City but because they know that booing and cat-calling him seriously puts him off his game and until he puts in a convincing performance against them they are going to use it as a tactic to beat him (and therefore us) with.
Seems like it's up to Raheem to silence Dipper critics but the hard evidence is that despite a remarkable season for us he continues to seriously disappoint whenever he returns to Anfield.
 
Anybody think Mangala would have been a better option instead of Stones yesterday? Was clumsy against Bristol but so was Stones. Mangala may have made a difference with his pace & Strength? Can't see Firmino troubling Manga for strength & pace on the second goal.
 
Anybody think Mangala would have been a better option instead of Stones yesterday? Was clumsy against Bristol but so was Stones. Mangala may have made a difference with his pace & Strength? Can't see Firmino troubling Manga for strength & pace on the lobbed goal.

No because Mangala is poor. Always has been always will be. Liverpool would have been all over him like a rash.
 
Speaking to a Liverpool fan at work today and after giving him the glare when asked "did you see the game ?" the conversation moved on about the main talking points of yesterday in a calm and level manner. I then asked him about the behaviour of the Liverpool fans towards Raheem Sterling and "why are they so bitter after 3 years considering Van Dyck, Lallana and Mane all did the same to force moves from their old club to move to Liverpool?" His reply was that Liverpool fans aren't bitter towards Sterling leaving them for City but because they know that booing and cat-calling him seriously puts him off his game and until he puts in a convincing performance against them they are going to use it as a tactic to beat him (and therefore us) with.
Seems like it's up to Raheem to silence Dipper critics but the hard evidence is that despite a remarkable season for us he continues to seriously disappoint whenever he returns to Anfield.

If it works, why change it? Seems like a sensible move to me. If I was sat there I really couldn't be arsed booing every time someone touched a ball but the scousers seem to like that sort of stuff
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.