Liverpool (A) Post Match Thread

He didn't, he said the ref favoured the home side ( which he did) , referred to him missing numerous yellow card offences and highlighted a couple of other incidents, one he referred to as debatable.

Which is the most ironic thing in it, if he is mentioning yellow cards missed why wasn't Fernandinhos numerous ones mentioned? Oh because the worlds against us, every ref and every media broadcast. The ref was fine and the fact people are still moaning suggests it will never matter how a ref performs as they're all out to get us zzzzzzzzzzzzzz
 
Which is the most ironic thing in it, if he is mentioning yellow cards missed why wasn't Fernandinhos numerous ones mentioned? Oh because the worlds against us, every ref and every media broadcast. The ref was fine and the fact people are still moaning suggests it will never matter how a ref performs as they're all out to get us zzzzzzzzzzzzzz

It's been all of a minute and pigeonho hasn't liked your post yet. Standards slipping.
 
Which is the most ironic thing in it, if he is mentioning yellow cards missed why wasn't Fernandinhos numerous ones mentioned? Oh because the worlds against us, every ref and every media broadcast. The ref was fine and the fact people are still moaning suggests it will never matter how a ref performs as they're all out to get us zzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Numerous ones Tom? He commited four fouls, one of which was the free Van Dijk got when he handled the ball, which wasn't eveb a free let alone a potential yellow. So 3 fouls that may or may not have been yellows is numerous is it?

The refs almost always give the home side the benefit of the doubt, particularly at Anfield and that's what the poster referred to, he never declared he was shit.
 
Numerous ones Tom? He commited four fouls, one of which was the free Van Dijk got when he handled the ball, which wasn't eveb a free let alone a potential yellow. So 3 fouls that may or may not have been yellows is numerous is it?

The refs almost always give the home side the benefit of the doubt, particularly at Anfield and that's what the poster referred to, he never declared he was shit.

His post wasn't a simple "the ref favoured the home side" he went out of his way to list decisions that went against us whilst ignoring decisions that went for us. If you consider Bernardo got booked for his first foul the numerous committed by Fernandinho should have resulted in action. There was one in the second half where he was near the left back position, biggest block and foul you'll see in your life. Before anything happened both Neville and Tyler said surely he's getting booked now. That's not because of some big agenda between the two, it is because they have eyes and have seen how the game has gone.
 
His post wasn't a simple "the ref favoured the home side" he went out of his way to list decisions that went against us whilst ignoring decisions that went for us. If you consider Bernardo got booked for his first foul the numerous committed by Fernandinho should have resulted in action. There was one in the second half where he was near the left back position, biggest block and foul you'll see in your life. Before anything happened both Neville and Tyler said surely he's getting booked now. That's not because of some big agenda between the two, it is because they have eyes and have seen how the game has gone.

It was and he highlighted two incidents, one of which he said was debatable, page 117 Tom, take a look.
 
2 Roma fans on trial at Preston crown court today - allegedly involved in trouble before the semi-final leg at Anfield - but after a six month investigation into the disorder at the corresponding CL fixture involving City - no arrests - always the victims
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.