Liverpool (Away) - Pre Match Thread

[BerkshireBlue]

Incredible how people, even those that were there or watched on TV all have forgotten that we were actually winning when Mane was sent off - but I guess that doesn't fit the myth

Not only winning we had 3 1v1s as well we could have easily ended the half being 4 nil up

 

[BerkshireBlue]

This is from Henry on skysports

"At the very beginning of the game City scored against the run of play. City were exposed on their left-hand side with [Nicolas] Otamendi and [Mohamed] Salah taking advantage of [Fabian] Delph, who we all know is not a left back, and Otamendi was exposed."

Now considering Delph wasn't even playing I'd question whether he actually watched the game. Plus there is no need for the dig about not being a left back. He is a left back and he's been the best in the league at it

 

[Ancient Citizen]

They still live for the return of Shankly and Paisley.

They won't win another title until one of them returns.

Or another sugar daddy, unfortunately Littlewoods pools won't be helping them to re-stock anytime soon.

 

[Stevieatlasblue]

And my point is, using history as an excuse to flap is pointless because City are making history this season. Have won there only once in 35 years? No team has achieved what City have this season in over 120 years of English top flight football.

If you don't have confidence that People Guardiola can go there and get a win then you haven't been paying attention this season. Arrogant or otherwise, the dippers are the underdogs. We've twatted them once this season and we'll do it yet again.

Edit: As for Bellamy, anyone can in theory beat anyone, but in reality no team has beaten City and that's not by fluke.

Your boring me now. Your first post was full of immature comments.yawn and bye.

 

[remember arthur mann]

That's cleared it up,

http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/sky-commentator-martin-tyler-dismisses-14142784.amp

 

[SWP's back]

On current form, I dont see much wrong with that assertion.

He’s played one fucking game!

 

[mancity1]

This is from Henry on skysports

"At the very beginning of the game City scored against the run of play. City were exposed on their left-hand side with [Nicolas] Otamendi and [Mohamed] Salah taking advantage of [Fabian] Delph, who we all know is not a left back, and Otamendi was exposed."

Now considering Delph wasn't even playing I'd question whether he actually watched the game. Plus there is no need for the dig about not being a left back. He is a left back and he's been the best in the league at it

I have watched this game a few times and Salah had one tame shot on goal in the first half that was saved pretty easily.

Mane was their main threat but again no end product.

Second half was probably our easiest match at home bar Stoke all season.

No matter the result on Sunday , Liverpool are overrated.

 

[BerkshireBlue]

I have watched this game a few times and Salah had one tame shot on goal in the first half that was saved pretty easily.

Mane was their main threat but again no end product.

Second half was probably our easiest match at home bar Stoke all season.

No matter the result on Sunday , Liverpool are overrated.

Yep that's how I saw the game as well. Changing to 4 at the back instead of 3 will cut off Mane's threat and their midfield is just turd so we should be able to stream roll them

 

[Ancient Citizen]

They have had the result changed from earlier in the season it now officially reads : MANCHESTER CITY 5 LIVERPOOL (But we would have won if we didnt have a man sent off) 0

The amount of Liverpool fans who have now convinced themselves that they would have definitely, without
a shadow of a doubt, won this match if it wasn't for Mane being sent off is unreal. I speak to loads of them,
pointing out that they were already 1-0 down, and yes, they had most of the possession for around a 20 minute period,
something we have almost as a matter of course in every game, and why didn't they score during this domination?
Then there is the ludicrous assumption that City, with the most devastating attack in the league,
(not theirs, ours, as the stats prove), wouldn't score again, oh no. Then, with 10 men, they go on to get twatted 5-0,
something that's not happened to any team as yet in the same circumstances, why did they concede so many,
could it be that City are a far better side?

 

[remember arthur mann]

Thought they were poor against Burnley and Everton but suppose it'll be their Cup Final.