Liverpool (H) | PL | Post Match Thread

himalayan_blues said:
It seemed all of their plan was to make salah one vs one against Nicp O reiley. Salah did get 4/5 good one vs one chances against Nico but Nico bossed salah. One moment nico was bypassed when schobozlia was involved.
Click to expand...
Saw a compilation video of all the times Nico got the better of him. Very impressive. Although I was at the game and felt he had a great game, where I am (behind the goal in SS1) you sometimes don't get to see and appreciate these moments as well as those in other areas of the ground and watching on TV.
 
abu13 said:
100%, this was my arguement, a player is deemed offside if he interferes with play. zit wss going straight at him and would have hit him if he didnt duck. Therefore his action means he must interfere with play.
They go on about the Wolves goal but Berny was nowhere near the flight of the ball.
Click to expand...
That's actually a great point. My initial reading was that The Don isn't getting to it whether Robertson is there or not but now I've read some of the other views I've come to the conclusion that there was fuck-all controversial about disallowing it.

Comparisons with our goal at Wolves last season are desperate because the situations weren't alike at all
 
Copied from Law 11

a player moving from, or standing in, an offside position is in the way of an opponent and interferes with the movement of the opponent towards the ball this is an offside offence if it impacts on the ability of the opponent to play or challenge for the ball

Freeze the action at the moment Van Dijk heads the ball, and Robertson is standing immediately to the left of Donnarumma. I think that Robertson's position at the moment Van Dijk heads the ball affects the ability of Donnarumma to challenge for the ball.
 
M18CTID said:
That's actually a great point. My initial reading was that The Don isn't getting to it whether Robertson is there or not but now I've read some of the other views I've come to the conclusion that there was fuck-all controversial about disallowing it.

Comparisons with our goal at Wolves last season are desperate because the situations weren't alike at all
Click to expand...
also just his presence in that area is interfering with the play, due to the flight of the ball donna doesnt know whether he is going to divert it or not so cant fully commit to the dive.
 
mancboy said:
also just his presence in that area is interfering with the play, due to the flight of the ball donna doesnt know whether he is going to divert it or not so cant fully commit to the dive.
Click to expand...
I have to say, it is this reason why i am unsure why more goals aren't chalked off where a player is hanging about near the keeper. and i include goals given for us as well. Surely, in an instinctive and close range situation such as a save, just someone's presence is enough to be interfering.

i'm not going to be popular for this but i think, e.g., Silva's interference at Wolves was enough to chalk off Stones' late goal.
 
East Level 2 said:
You ask; "where to next". The answer is PiGMOL HQ where they will ensure suitably sympathetic refereeing for the dippers over the next few months.
Click to expand...
I, and a fair number of other BM posters, including Toffeedude ( our lovely resident Everton fan) have maintained all this week that was the plan. There is absolutely NO WAY that any Dips goals are being disallowed again this season and watch the number of pk they are awarded increase significantly whilst there will be none awarded against them. It will become a quiz question because it will be as rare as a Preston Guild. Jesting aside, they do seem to have remarkably few pk awarded against them, I really can't recall any!!
 
shemnel said:
I have to say, it is this reason why i am unsure why more goals aren't chalked off where a player is hanging about near the keeper. and i include goals given for us as well. Surely, in an instinctive and close range situation such as a save, just someone's presence is enough to be interfering.

i'm not going to be popular for this but i think, e.g., Silva's interference at Wolves was enough to chalk off Stones' late goal.
Click to expand...

You are right, Silva's was also subjective.he wasn't in line at impact of the header by Stones, but his contact with the keeper, and movement would have meant if offside was the verdict I wouldn't have seen it as an obvious error.

Football is unique, luck or chance, plays a big part, mainly because teams are evenly matched, and the games are low scoring. This is the reason there are so many controversial moments and talking points.
 
At most this was a close call and could have gone either way, but for once it went our way, but more than that it was against the dippers, so it has gone from a close call to a grave injustice, on a national scale. If this was any other teams (other than us v rags) it is just a close call that could have gone either way
 
BringBackSwales said:
At most this was a close call and could have gone either way, but for once it went our way, but more than that it was against the dippers, so it has gone from a close call to a grave injustice, on a national scale. If this was any other teams (other than us v rags) it is just a close call that could have gone either way
Click to expand...
But thats the thing i dont think it is a close call, there is a far more cohesive and ranging argument for not giving it then there is for giving it, its just that the dippers are used to seeing every single call go in their favour they cant wrap their heads around one not going even if it was 80-20 in our favour not to give it.
 
69FACUPfinal said:
I, and a fair number of other BM posters, including Toffeedude ( our lovely resident Everton fan) have maintained all this week that was the plan. There is absolutely NO WAY that any Dips goals are being disallowed again this season and watch the number of pk they are awarded increase significantly whilst there will be none awarded against them. It will become a quiz question because it will be as rare as a Preston Guild. Jesting aside, they do seem to have remarkably few pk awarded against them, I really can't recall any!!
Click to expand...
Thats always been the thing with the cartel teams they are that used to being reffed in their favour they actually see being reffed fairly and within the laws of the game as a bias ref whos against them.
 
Blueboy73 said:
Have the professional victims stopped whinging and crying yet?
Click to expand...
All crying again on X over the panel ( probably ex dippers) saying it should have stood despite Webb saying otherwise. Gives them something to cry about and drag out to the anniversary of it.
 
hertsblue said:
All crying again on X over the panel ( probably ex dippers) saying it should have stood despite Webb saying otherwise. Gives them something to cry about and drag out to the anniversary of it.
Click to expand...
Good.
The international break gives them another week to stew over it and cry even more.
Continuing to live up to their victim tag whilst whinging at being labelled victims without a hint of irony.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top