What does the actual law say then?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Liverpool (H) Post Match Thread
- Thread starter Chi-town blues
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
What does the actual law say then?
B
B
blueinsa
Guest
What does the actual law say then?
Read back a few pages and you will see as its been posted.
sheepskin_tearaway
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Dec 2017
- Messages
- 682
Not sure if anyone’s pointed it out yet, but that win has put us cumulatively ahead of the dippers this season, on GD.
Prem: dippers 54, City 50. GD 39 for both.
CL: dippers 9 points (!), City 13. GD - dippers 2, City 10.
Overall: dippers 63 points GD 41. City 63 points GD 49.
Normally I’d think it was incredibly petty to point this out, but I’ve heard so much bilge about the dippers being so incredible, I thought it needed pointing out.
We’ve also now lost the same number of matches overall.
Prem: dippers 54, City 50. GD 39 for both.
CL: dippers 9 points (!), City 13. GD - dippers 2, City 10.
Overall: dippers 63 points GD 41. City 63 points GD 49.
Normally I’d think it was incredibly petty to point this out, but I’ve heard so much bilge about the dippers being so incredible, I thought it needed pointing out.
We’ve also now lost the same number of matches overall.
Read back a few pages and you will see as its been posted.
Can’t see it. Read from page 136 onwards.
B
B
blueinsa
Guest
Can’t see it. Read from page 136 onwards.
As Marvin says, Law 12 only talks about whether a tackle is careless, reckless or involves excessive force/brutality that endangers the safety of a player. It's quite acceptable to tackle with two feet as long as it's not any of these.
aguero93:20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2013
- Messages
- 90,262
- Location
- Hunting Cats.
- Team supported
- Some gobshites in day-glo green and black.
NapoliWe’ve also now lost the same number of matches overall.
PSG
Red Star
Chelsea
Us - 5
Lyon
Chelsea
Palace
Leicester - 4
@blueinsa To be fair that is someone’s summary of the post. Does anyone have the actual wording from FIFA?
And also referees interpretation of careless and reckless has clearly been feet off the ground over the least few years in situations like this. Wrongly or rightly that’s what we’ve all witnessed in the prem and especially the CL so don’t quite understand the venom or anomistity towards other blues who are simply pointing this out...
None of us wanted Kompany sent off. He wasn’t. He was booked which I personally think is fair. The ref isn’t “bent” or “bias” or any other stupid conspiracy theories people have.
B
B
blueinsa
Guest
@blueinsa To be fair that is someone’s summary of the post. Does anyone have the actual wording from FIFA?
Is your google broken?
http://www.thefa.com/football-rules.../football-11-11/law-12---fouls-and-misconduct
I imagine if Kompany was sent off it would fall under the section of lunges. He wasn’t though so it’s all bit pointless this.
It's all semantics. The words careless, reckless, excessive force derived from the recast of the laws 20 years ago but it was only later FIFA tacked onto it the free kick /yellow / red definitions. Reckless should have been the red and excessive force (i.e. getting the ball but just too hard) shouid have been yellow.
It’s not all semantics tho. Suggest you take a look....pics & everyfink ;)
https://www.fifa.com/mm/document/afdeveloping/refereeing/law_12_fouls_misconduct_en_47379.pdf
- Status
- Not open for further replies.