BringBackSwales
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 33,650
As a contest it was well and truly over by the half hour mark: only as a humiliation did it last the full 90 minutes and more. Liverpool were slick and assured: City were truly abysmal. Now we are hearing from pundits and fans who say they saw it all coming from the time the teams were announced. When I got the team news I was surprised to see that Otamendi and Fernandinho were on the bench but there was nothing in the starting eleven which caused me any alarm. It seemed that the question facing Pellers was one of availability rather than suitability for the fixture. Sergio was fit, but we all knew he would not play more than an hour, Eliaquim was a certain starter if you take account of where our players had been and what they had done during the international break and if one had to pick the best eleven from the 22 named to start the match, it would have been the City eleven, with Coutinho the only Liverpudlian in with a shout. Some City fans were worried, not about our team, but because "it was against Liverpool" - as though the same kind of magic lurks in the muddy waters of the Mersey as used to inhabit the Manchester United badge, which means that mediocre teams become world beaters. Klopp is not a manager but a wizard just as Ferguson was always going to "get things right". In face Liverpool had played 7 games under Klopp and won 3 - only one in the league, at Chelsea. The others were 1-0 against Rubin Kazan and Bournemouth. Their last league outing had been a home defeat to Palace. There was nothing in Liverpool' form (going back over 5 years!) to suggest anything more than an upper mid-table team.
We got massacred and it's this that gives some spurios support to claims that it was inevitable with the two teams picked. I would ask which PL teams City would have beaten on Saturday? It was not the selection but the performance of the players which produced such a miserable hour and a half. Pellegrini has some responsibility in this, in particular as to weather Sagna and in particular Mangala should have been anywhere near a football match after the ordeal they have been through but the club are better placed to decide than I am. We do have a problem in central midfield and this has dogged us under Pellers since day one, but never so disastrously badly as on Saturday and usually only against opposition of a rather higher class than Liverpool. So, I'm not saying that everything in the garden is rosy and 4-1 defeats should not happen, but I don't think it's time to panic or rant and rave.
I agree with a lot of what you say, but you don't seem to take account of 1 why did we play 2 not 3 in central mid against a team who would pack that area 2 leaving our front 4 starved of possession and not involved enough in the game and 3 given Kompanys absence was it really the right match in which to play Mangala and Martin together for what I think was the first time?