supercity88
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Aug 2009
- Messages
- 13,970
The argument that "Liverpool won 5-1 so the decisions made no difference" is a complete crock. Even if you ignore the Salah offside (as it was very close), the first leg clearly should have finished 3-2 (assuming we slot the penalty from the foul on Sterling). Then with an early goal in the second leg, we are clear favourites at that point to progress. Liverpool might still have come back and won, but the way we played that first half, it's unlikely. Up to half time at the the Etihad, Liverpool had been on top for one half and we on top for two halves. Those are facts.
Don't forget the Sane goal at home to make it 2-0... would have been 4-3 to us on aggregate and Liverpool would have needed two goals.
We will get the luck and win it next season instead!