Metalartin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Jul 2015
- Messages
- 12,372
Just had a proper look over at RAWK, for the first time .
They're so pathetic, they can't call Bluemoon, the way that lot go on. It's all financial doping this, financial doping that... obsessed with money if anything. It's almost like they resent not being bought out by D.I.C.
Are they even aware, "financial doping" is word not even used in football before Wenger himself coined it? They're that bitter, they're resorting to Wenger speak. Arsenal being a club, that's taken millions from Abu Dhabi(Dubai) in sponsorship money, from 2004.
What is the difference between Arsenal taking money from Emirates, or Barca until the summer just gone taking millions from Qatar for several years? The fact that a business made their own choice, to sponsor who they wanted to and not who Liverpool fans feel they should? Or the fact that they think it's not fair market value? When it's now widely accepted, that what we currently get is fair market value(probably under market value as of today). Maybe in the early days(for most of which, there were no reactionary FFP "rules" to "cheat"), it was over fair market value, but that had to happen if we wanted to grow and rise to the top and then we went and won the premier league, in the most dramatic fashion to date.
Cheating my arse, it's called investment and now that investment is coming good, deal with it.
They're so pathetic, they can't call Bluemoon, the way that lot go on. It's all financial doping this, financial doping that... obsessed with money if anything. It's almost like they resent not being bought out by D.I.C.
Are they even aware, "financial doping" is word not even used in football before Wenger himself coined it? They're that bitter, they're resorting to Wenger speak. Arsenal being a club, that's taken millions from Abu Dhabi(Dubai) in sponsorship money, from 2004.
What is the difference between Arsenal taking money from Emirates, or Barca until the summer just gone taking millions from Qatar for several years? The fact that a business made their own choice, to sponsor who they wanted to and not who Liverpool fans feel they should? Or the fact that they think it's not fair market value? When it's now widely accepted, that what we currently get is fair market value(probably under market value as of today). Maybe in the early days(for most of which, there were no reactionary FFP "rules" to "cheat"), it was over fair market value, but that had to happen if we wanted to grow and rise to the top and then we went and won the premier league, in the most dramatic fashion to date.
Cheating my arse, it's called investment and now that investment is coming good, deal with it.
Last edited: