Man City - cheating bastards rumbled
www.redandwhitekop.com
Why are they using Euros for an English club which uses GBP? To show bigger values and leave out the currency symbols in their little poxy lists perhaps? Also, what room has he to talk, conveniently selecting his moaning point at £50m, when one of Liverpool's CB's cost nearly 2 of ours in that list?
"In our history City have never spent close to £80m on one defender Liverpool and United both have, so nerr" Petty cunts.
It's not a good thing that Dejan Lovren is their second most expensive defender either. It shows what happened to them this season, was inevitable and if they don't spend to strengthen the depth of that defence soon, they could continue to go backwards in that area. I'm not sure VVD returning, is a guarantee that those players will return to the level he dragged them to again, after falling so far off the standard for so long.
Anyway lets just add it all together and see what we have, shall we?
Total is £368.19m, for the above mentioned players. We'd have to include Zinchenko, who was not really bought as a defender but he has been part of our defence for years now, cost £1.8m. He's preferred over Mendy who hasn't worked out since his injury in his first season with us 4 years ago -
But "Pep just goes out and spends" doesn't he? No, if Pep has quality to work with he can and will make do with what he has.
Total is £369.99m, for one of the best defences in Europe right now. Outside of Mendy, you'd have to say it was good business on all of those signings, can many of those other teams say the same?
Manchester United
Harry Maguire - £78.30m
Victor Lindelöf - £31.50m
Eric Bailly - £34.20m
Luke Shaw - £33.75m
Aaron Wan-Bissaka - £49.50m
Phil Jones - £17.37m
Alex Telles - £13.50m
Total is £258.25m, for a defence which on one of their current squad's best seasons, it has conceded only 4 goals less than Liverpool's without VVD, 2 goals less than Arsenal's, Chelsea have conceded 4 goals less. Also, do they really only have one right back? Not only is the quality of the starting back 4 lower but their cover is lacking too, even compared to other teams. They've been lucky with injuries by the looks of it, maybe that could come back to bite them, like it has City and Liverpool in recent seasons. Personally, I actually think Leicester and Villa probably have better defences than them, with more depth to cover for injuries.
There's no denying City have spent a lot on their defence but they've spent well for the most part. However, what is always overlooked, is the fact that Pep had to correct many mistakes of the previous manager's transfers in that area and that it's harder to find bargains when pressed for time. Side-backs are where you can find your bargains with some patience but not many of the top clubs have found bargains at CB because they seem in short supply(maybe we need to hire Leicester's defender scouts or hack them... "the Liverpool way").
How many managers have had to deal with as much as Pep did when he came to City? 4 side-backs needed replacing at once because of age(bad planning, left City with a lot to do in very little time). Otamendi, he got the best season he's ever given us out of atleast but he quickly declined after that. Kompany couldn't stay fit as much as he used to, nothing Pep could do there. Mangala was Mangala and near impossible to shift off the books . Denayer and Tosin were unproven and nowhere near ready for PL football.
Nobody can say City didn't need to spend again after Kompany left either, it was a mistake not bringing in Dias(or someone like him) sooner if anything. We might not have bought Ake if we had IMO, who was an insurance policy, bought early in the window. In case everyone priced us out, which looked a possibility for a while. We could easily make most of what we paid on Ake back, if we wanted to sell.