Liverpool thread 2020/21

Status
Not open for further replies.
There's a clip on twitter eulogising one of their goals against Leicester that was completed after thirty passes, apparently they reckon it's a PL record. It seems our FFP goal (forty four passes) has been expunged.
 
There's a clip on twitter eulogising one of their goals against Leicester that was completed after thirty passes, apparently they reckon it's a PL record. It seems our FFP goal (forty four passes) has been expunged.
We’ve been saying for years that Littlewoods fans have short and/or selective memories.
 
We’ve been saying for years that Littlewoods fans have short and/or selective memories.
Think you're forgetting the It Means More equation

q=p-A(2e+H+C)
---------------------
Istree

Where they quality of the goal (q) is defined by the number of passes, minus the distance in miles from Anfield, multiplied by the result of doubling the number of ex player pundits on tv from your club (e) and adding to the successful number of hacks pulled off by your club (H) and successful coach attacks (C), divided by a Istree factor known only to certain in the know clubs.

Therefore our adjusted number of passes is not in fact 44, but around minus 200.
 
Last edited:
Think you're forgetting the It Means More equation

q=p-A(2e+H+C)
---------------------
Istree

Where they quality of the goal (q) is defined by the number of passes, minus the distance in miles from Anfield, multiplied by the result of doubling the number of ex player pundits on tv from your club (e) and adding to the successful number of hacks pulled off by your club (H) and successful coach attacks (C), divided by a Istree factor known only to certain in the know clubs.

Therefore our adjusted number of passes is not in fact 44, but around minus 200.
Great post that's made me laugh
 
Think you're forgetting the It Means More equation

q=p-A(2e+H+C)
---------------------
Istree

Where they quality of the goal (q) is defined by the number of passes, minus the distance in miles from Anfield, multiplied by the result of doubling the number of ex player pundits on tv from your club (e) and adding to the successful number of hacks pulled off by your club (H) and successful coach attacks (C), divided by a Istree factor known only to certain in the know clubs.

Therefore our adjusted number of passes is not in fact 44, but around minus 200.
Amazing piece of work that aligns perfectly with the third law of Scouse dynamics:
Shell suit + 'Calm Down!' = Punch in the Face
 
Think you're forgetting the It Means More equation

q=p-A(2e+H+C)
---------------------
Istree

Where they quality of the goal (q) is defined by the number of passes, minus the distance in miles from Anfield, multiplied by the result of doubling the number of ex player pundits on tv from your club (e) and adding to the successful number of hacks pulled off by your club (H) and successful coach attacks (C), divided by a Istree factor known only to certain in the know clubs.

Therefore our adjusted number of passes is not in fact 44, but around minus 200.
When considering the understanding of footy of the average Anfield Road Formation Brick Thrower, I always referred to the statistical formula relative to Red Scousers postulated by a school chum of mine over 50 years ago.. '9/10ths of 7/8ths of 4/5ths of 2/3rds of f*ck all..'

Your theorem takes us into new areas of understanding. Excellent work!
 
Think you're forgetting the It Means More equation

q=p-A(2e+H+C)
---------------------
Istree

Where they quality of the goal (q) is defined by the number of passes, minus the distance in miles from Anfield, multiplied by the result of doubling the number of ex player pundits on tv from your club (e) and adding to the successful number of hacks pulled off by your club (H) and successful coach attacks (C), divided by a Istree factor known only to certain in the know clubs.

Therefore our adjusted number of passes is not in fact 44, but around minus 200.
Talking about hacks, the Mail has a piece about the rags and their little quandary. They put up a graphic about the City hack and ffp but nothing about a certain club also hacking us numerous times. I wonder why?
 
I see some scousers we’re trying to associate themselves with Maradona on Twitter. There was even a Maradona shirt left on a seat at Anfield!

Why can’t they just accept that people die and that they don’t always have to be part of it?

Except for Hillsborough and Heysel, when it was nothing to do with them
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.